@
Jeff19
posted a description of his setup that resonates with my experience with my home-brew "BaseTwo25" setup. Now that I have things dialed in more carefully, I have to say that I have never had such resolution available to me. To wax poetic for a moment, it is in my experience a rare combination of all time low levels of ear fatigue combined with all time high levels of subtle resolution. It feels effortless, relaxed and luxurious while providing the clearest view of subtle differences that I have ever experienced in any of my setups.
Details of my home-brew "BaseTwo25":
SPL Phonitor 2 monitor controller
SPL Crossover set at 120hz (4th order Linkwitz-Riley)
Dynaudio 18s subwoofers (two of them)
I was so impressed with the SPL Crossover sound quality that I brought in an SPL Phonitor 2 (not the x version which has a built in D/A). I wanted to see if there would be any benefit to be had over my passive monitor controller. To my great surprise, there is a slight improvement when going to a very high quality active monitor controller. I don't know why but my suspicion is that it is a combination of impedance interaction and "Damping Factor". DF is normally discussed in relation to amplifiers controlling speaker cone movement, but the active circuitry feels like it has more authority and agility throughout the spectrum. I also leave both SPL units running 24/7. (Yes it makes a subtle difference, and yes, there appeared to my ears that there was some "break-in" benefit over two weeks. Subtle but welcome and this may contribute toward lower ear fatigue.)
The 120hz 4th order crossover frequency feels like it gives me maximum transparency in the system. Positioning the subs at that crossover becomes critical, as with the 3rd order filter in the Amphion stack, which crosses over at 100hz.
The small Dynaudio subs, to compensate for not having a large box, need to employ an A/D and DSP to make the response work properly, which results in a 2.5ms delay. To account for this, I have them set 34 inches closer than the Two18. The subs are almost at my feet, to my left and right. This is actually an advantage in my setup, because if I had the Amphion stack, those would wind up being in the corners of the room and probably causing headaches for me with corner reinforcement and room modes.
So far I am not detecting any "problems" with that crossover frequency, and my ears are happier than they have ever been. Sine wave sweeps through the crossover zone feel right. Is it perfect? Most likely not, but for my taste I am very happy. Is the full Amphion stack superior? Most likely, but I do have my setup dialed in very differently and tuned to my taste.
UPDATE 01/20/2022:
The process of dialing-in the system brought me a little education. The Dynaudio subs have a digital control panel that lets you dial in the level of the sub in 0.5 db steps. Every 3db, there is a very tiny "bup" (not really a pop) that is audible because your ear is right down there at the sub. I assume it is the result of a DSP re-set for the gain range. I needed to dial in approximately 6db extra gain on the subs to match up with the Two18 levels. This got me thinking....
The SPL Analog Active Crossover has a large knob on the front labeled "Trim". It lets you dial in as much as -10db or +10db of level for the subs, with zero being top-dead-center. It is also a continuously variable control. The SPL uses their own discrete 120v rail op-amps that give tremendous headroom and sonic quality. So, I did the experiment. I set the Dynaudio subs to zero, no gain. I then dialed up the SPL sub level. That was a bit of an eye opener. It is not clear to me exactly what is being done within the Dynaudio subs for the level control, but using the SPL to boost the level is far superior. More texture and agility in the bass, more clarity in the midrange. I also found that, as you start to get close to the proper level, very small changes have a very noticeable impact on the midrange quality. At the 120hz 4th order crossover, level settings are much less forgiving. This trim control is definitely not a "fun" control. It either works right, or it doesn't!
My conclusion at this point is that I was very fortunate in my selection of the SPL crossover. The sonic quality and features are beyond reproach in my opinion. The Dynaudio subs are a compromise, for sure, due to the A/D and DSP time delay. I am fortunate in being able to position them in such a way that I can compensate for the 2.5 ms delay that equates to approximately 34 inches closer to the listening position. The SPL crossover does have a phase control section with a bypass switch. I have chosen not to play with that yet since I can compensate with positioning at the moment. If I wish to in the future, I could build my own BaseTwo units with the Seas drivers and passive resonators, but then I would be putting those in the corners of the room and causing corner reinforcement etc. This means that, in my situation, the "compromise" of the Dynaudio subs actually works to my advantage. The sound quality of the final setup feels seamless, cohesive and just amazing. No going back for me.
For those who do not have the luxury of being able to experiment, or who have no inclination toward that, I would absolutely recommend the all Amphion solution. Now, that being said..... based upon my experience with the Amp500, which I swapped into the system briefly yesterday, I believe I have a more transparent and resolving system by going with the SPL crossover and my off-brand amplifiers. Just sayin'.