Converters from the 80s and 90s were technically different from today's delta sigma high order modulation converters with steep digital filters.
How many albums out today are made with tons of hardware and no ITB processing? And with people listening to a signal directly and not behind aforementioned modern converters?
I went to great lenghts to do all the processing (aside from things like level changes and slow noise gates and such) OTB and use converters with no ds and no steep filters. Do that and you get that "analog" sound.
hmm, what converters did you settle on? even my prism ad124 is delta/sigma
hmm, what converters did you settle on? even my prism ad124 is delta/sigma
I use a discrete resistor ladder multichannel DAC that I assembled from stereo boards. My AD of choice is the Lavry Gold MKIII.
Apart from delta sigma the filters used in modern converters and the way jitter supression is done (centered on higher frequencies rather than single digit and low double digit Hz jitter) seems to play a big role.
How do you think about ESS compared to those exotic converters?
I wouldn't call them exotic, the conversion technology is a lot more straightforward than the complicated math of modern DS converters.
ESS sounds maybe a little clearer dynamically than others but has an artificial sheen on top like the rest of them. Of the DS converters I liked designs based on the Cirrus CS5381best, I think...
Has anyone done a Merging Hapi vs Dangerous Music 8 channel Convert-8 DAC shootout? This happened between the Hapi and the 2 channel Convert-2 Dangerous Music Convert users?
But such comparisons are obviously inappropriate given the economics versus the number of channels.