Notice how when its a fully blind test and you can't rely on your biases.....all of the 'analog one has bigger, brighter, deeper, fuller, classier sound with more clarity, width and oomph' comments are nowhere to be seen.
I just came from the slate La2a comparison where there was a video (so one could see which was which) and it is laden with all those comments.
People seem so confident that
A. Analog is always better on everything
B. They could tell which one is analog 100% of the time.
A test like this reveals
A. All processors are different and thus, some will sound better on some sources than others. Maybe a brighter comp will sound better on a dull mix etc.
B. Our ears and tastes are wildly different. As with speakers, one persons perfection is another persons 'bright and harsh'
C. It can be difficult to tell them apart sometimes.
I think it is a great idea to keep the results private! If they were made public, the thread would gain 10 pages overnight of people saying
'I knew X was analog all along, I just didn't post cos it was so obvious' lol