Quote:
Originally Posted by
breakmixer
β‘οΈ
Good question, I'd like to know also...
Perhaps if the 909 samples have been present in many OTHER commercial products (Romplers, Workstations, Electribes/Grooveboxes, plugins, etc,) for so many years then they'd have a hard time making a legal case for it. Behringer would have no end of examples of times they DIDN'T seek legal action, and that doesn't look very good for your copyright.
Then again they successfully got Propellerhead to stop selling Rebirth on the app store, but that might have just been intimidation with a cease and desist (a cease and desist doesn't even mean the defendant actually did anything wrong, it's an inexpensive intimidation/bullying tactic). I would guess Propellerhead caved in because they just didn't care so much about Rebirth anymore. They probably figured it wasn't worth the legal fees to defend it even though they might have easily won that lawsuit and might have been able to keep selling Rebirth.
There's no end of supposedly legally distributed sample packs, plugins (Revolution) with 909 samples in them. Roland might have to prove that they made consistent effort to defend their copyright and is not cherry picking.
As far as I know, and I'm no lawyer, this doesn't automatically mean Roland couldn't successfully win such a case, but it might be very difficult.