Quote:
Originally Posted by
GrammynOut2
β‘οΈ
Old 80βs sounds yet again.
Back in the days synth manufacturers were trying to make new sounds and new instruments with each release. We get to the 2000βs and new synth technology just stopped.
Whatβs worse is there are very few virtual instruments developers even trying to make new sounds with the power of digital available.
So many say music is stale. Part of it is we donβt get the any new sounds like we used to in the days of βun-staleβ music.
Really on point, this comment - in two ways:
1. The early/mid-80s in particular had an explosion of new textures, plus new technology, which made everything a sonic delight - new sounds were around every corner, and there was a gold rush of who could use a new sound in a hit song first.
2. Those same aspects consigned a lot of creative invention (e.g. classical study) to the scrap-heap, because so much was available at the push of a button. Sonic novelty is a cruel mistress, quickly wearing out its welcome and requiring new infusions. We've reached the logical end of that with bit-crushing and granular, leaving quick-change timbre the only novelty remaining.
The ultimate irony is the late obsession with lo-fi: no longer pushing forward, but returning to older sounds as more genuine/warm.
What I like about the analog revival is the forced return to pre-modern requirements: instead of an infinite menu of pre-made possibilities, these are machines which only do what they do. Modern versions are often augmented to soften the less-inspiring challenges (e.g. adding minor effects/sequencer) -- but no more; the user has to grapple with the beast as is.
I've been waiting for the Wave -- even to the extent of selling other gear to make space for it. Whether people use it to make new sounds or only relive the old -- that's really up to the individual people. The modern trend is backward-looking, but that doesn't mean those same tools can't be used looking forward; all it takes is to be an artist