TAL- Togu Audio Line: Home

TAL-Bassline 101 is 100% accurate monosyth + polyphony option.

See the hardware manual to learn its feature set
ftp://ftp.roland.co.uk/productsuppor..._SH-101_OM.pdf

Any sound demos?

I bought and use Tal Uno LX and I think it is excellent (and I have a real Juno 106 beside me!), so I will probably pick this one up too....

Great to see you guys are able to move from free to affordable VSTI

The Juno Emu is on my list, will have to check out the 101 when it comes out

Looks good. Big fan of TAL; freebies and good value plugins.

By interesting to see how this compares to other more expensive offerring of the 100% emu claims ie; D16 Lush101, Diva or possibly Monark although the latter are probably not a fair comparisson due to features I guess.

+1 here too.
TAL is doing a great job !
I didn't hear anyone nail the Juno-60 as they did...

Ermagerd when !?

Can't wait for this one. I already own the Lush 101, so it'll be fun to test this one too
I love the TAL stuff!

Cannot wait for this.

Love tal audio. Definite buy for me as long as pitch bend and modulation wheels work with this.
If I remember correctly, the free bass line plugin doesnt have that option.

You have Pitch / Mod and basically every other feature in that manual.

I'll reserve large part of my opinion until it comes out, but for an sh-101 emu the other one is already pretty definitive I would say, even if it may not be '100%' as TAL says his is. Though I'm not hatin', I just don't see what to ... do with it...

Wow u got em dude.. Hi 5

you should've informed yourself a bit better before attacking the dev in such a rude way. his juno 60 plugin has been highly praised here on GS (by many owners of the hardware too). it seems like TAL have nailed it as close as it can get in 2013. they seem to know what they're doing.

really looking forward to trying the 101!

"100% authentic sounding SH-101 emulation" would sound better (and accurate about the whole thing).

Highly praised is not the same 100% accurate emulation

Consumers can say what they want it's a free forum

True opinions are 100% free and valid.

I've got all of tal plugs - the free and the payed and there great.
I like what I've heard better than the d12 which , to me, lost the simplicity of the 101 from the outset.
I think it might be an English/ language thing. Give the guy a break for christs sake!

We shall see!

Ignoring the "100%" line because it's silly... but who cares.

and also... I think I'm one of the few people who actually wasn't that impressed with the U NO LX. I bought it immediately but have only used it on I think 1 track so far.

all that aside... I'm very excited by this and will probably buy it immediately also. I have great faith in TAL and use the Chorus and Vocoder regularly.

You'll probably be just as unimpressed with a hardware Juno 60 as you are with the TAL emu. We have to judge softsynths like these for what they aim to achieve. A softsynth like d16 Nepheton aims to emulate a hardware 808 and you have to judge on the basis of how well it accomplishes that limited goal, not by all the sounds a hardware 808 can't make.

I feel TAL's efforts are so refined these digital naysayers will fail at least 50% in blind A/B

Well those comparison tests for the U-NO-LX were spot on with the hardware, so i expect alot of work has been put into this one.
What i'd like to hear though is a shootout where a lead or chords are being physically played with keytracking and velocity mapped to filter and another modulating parameter if available.
Thats where i think you'll hear a tiny difference as the hardware won't behave as perfectly as software. For me personally the difference is too insignificant for a typical production. If i fail a legitimate blind test on that - great !

I'm very familiar with both the Juno 106 and 60. Not as familiar with the 6. So I know it's capabilities.

I know that put back to back solo LX matched very well. I just didn't feel the mojo. And it's not just a software vs hardware thing. I sold a Moog after getting Diva. haha.

Saw this on rekkerd

DIVA is a more versatile synth but the TAL-Uno-LX does the Juno better than anything out there.

NI Monark does the Model D as well as TAL does the Juno.

That gui looks great.

I agree, and could care less about marketing jargon.

I'll be getting this. I've used the old free one on quite a few albums. But the addition of the sequencer makes this a no brainer for me.

I'm interested in this. I like both tal-u-no-lx and the D16 LuSH-101. Will be interesting to put LuSH and this to test. I feel LuSH is quite a bit more complex than I would've needed, so this might become handy if the cpu hit isn't too big.

Did you upgrade (free) to the newer V2 version? The sound is much improved, more beefy and also cleaner.

Burn, burn!!!