Quote:
Originally Posted by
comfortablynick
β‘οΈ
Didn't they remove the distortion from Lennon's vocal on "She's So Heavy" digitally for the 2009 remaster? (I think that was the song.) Is that the kind of thing you're talking about?
It seems theoretically possible for an algorithm to "guess" what the waveform would look like without distortion.
While I am disappointed with everything they have so far, I agree it will be possible someday. This is not from any deep knowledge of how they work, but just from my experience of a lifetime of watching "impossible" things eventually becoming part of my everyday workflow!
But the thing about something like this is that it will always be
guessing. Say you zoom in on a car from outer space and that car's license plate is one pixel in your camera. Well an AI can "zoom in" further and 'create' a reasonable-looking license plate, but it won't be the actual license plate. It won't be the actual numbers of that car. From one pixel, it would only be guessing at the state. The AI is creating new information and passing it off as 'enhancement' or 'repair'. It is not really being "extracted" - it is being "extrapolated".
Philosophically problematic and not admissible in court, but it could be just fine for "art", in the sense that the singer might not care if that's what he actually sounded like on that day, as long as it sounds less distorted.