I know I'm largely hust talking to myself at this point

but others may wish to join in or find this more of interest once the texture lab is released...
After rtfm of both devices, beyond the extra osc per voice and higher bit depth and sampling rate of the lemondrop, the two appear to have more in common than not when it comes to features and capabilities.
There are some per grain pitch and pan mod features that the lemondrop has and that I am not sure whether the texture lab has. So, I'll be interested in learning more about that potential difference.
That being said, the texture lab is looking better and better to me, relative to the lemondrop, because (in addition to the price difference) I think I can live with 1 v 2 granular osc per voice (they both have 4 voices) and the somewhat reduced bit/sample (16/32k) specs on the texture lab don't really bother me. Also, while I do see some attractiveness in the lemondrop's waveform display, I think I see more attractiveness in the texture lab's massively increased number of knobs and buttons!