Quote:
Originally Posted by
vitocorleone123
β‘οΈ
Here comes the freight train for all the US musicians on the tracks. This is an example of how a $399 drum machine will cost $977 in the US.
My first thought is that if this 145% duty happens, they aren't going to be selling many units to the USA.
But my 2nd thought is that this is a marketing push to get potential users to buy now and not wait, just like a lot of other retailers outside the audio world. It will be interesting to see the actual price after the 145% duty. I doubt it will be anywhere close to $977 however I have no clue as to their target market other than EDM.
I do wonder how Behringer is going to manage this considering they are in China and their plants are undergoing robotic assembly lines.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Meester Smeeeth
β‘οΈ
Iβm going to keep spending to an absolute minimum from now on. I can do it. Honest.
It's relatively easy for me. How much blame can I put on my tools for not achieving the same quality as my favorite producers, tracking engineers, mix engineers, and mastering engineers?
I don't think it's the hardware other than conversion, when Serban mixes it.
What really is the barrier assuming one exists? The room? Mics? Experience? Isn't there enough good software to cover the room and mics these days? This isn't Antares Mic Modler from 25 years ago. What's my problem if I want to be "just as good..."
Other than tools with AI, I don't see a lot of real innovation, since many have gone to $29, and I'm not convinced AI is going to be the ticket. I see a lot of re-hashed technology. Improved GUI, resizable demands, bigger librarys, and anything to make life easier for $29.
As I said before, I think Dirk got out at the right time.
So for me, it is easy to keep the spending at a minimum because it's not the tools.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
easyrider
β‘οΈ
I have V8 and Arturia don't quite hit the mark when it comes to Gforce and UAD with their plugins IMO.
Considering all that Arturia have released from their beginnings, plus all the revisions over the years, I'm not sure it's a fair comparison, especially with UAD. Personally I wish UAD had stayed where they were 5 years ago charging "outrageous" money for a single plug, and Arturia had not released any effects at all focusing on synth instruments only.
Do what you do best. Then Arturia might have had the budget to create a Yamaha GX1 emulation. But marketing 101 suggests you can't do that any longer which IMO is sad. We got a Cherry Audio GX-80 and a CR-78 that patch writer Dave Polich suggests is "close enough."
For the longest time, Gforce just had a coffee stained Melotron while Arturia had dozens of classic synths. Other than the Prophet5 and my OB8 I can't comment about quality of emulations. The Prophet 5 IMO is close. The OB-xa is pretty laughable even though it's not a direct comparison. Is there enough demand to improve either emulations? I don't think the money to get closer is there any longer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
easyrider
β‘οΈ
IK and Arturia have lost my interest.
I dumped IK over 20 years ago with no regrets, and no further comment.
The newer Arturia instrument releases have not been ones I desire. The last one I considered was the CP-70, but after comparing it to the Hollowsun CP-70 which was released long ago, I felt Arturia might be pursuing quantity over quality....sort of like NI.
Question for anyone: I googled "best CP-70 VST" and after 6 pages I gave up because there were no hits for the Hollowsun CP-70. Am I searching wrong? I get Sweetwater and Arturia advertisements on every page.