Quote:
Originally Posted by
potscrubber
β‘οΈ
Yeah I have a Pulse 16 MX as part of a larger all RME MADI network. The Pulse works great, but I have noticed it is more sensitive to clocking issues than the RME gear. If I mess something up somewhere with clocking it can take me a while to troubleshoot because the Pulse is not behaving in typical ways for user instigaged clock errors (basically clicks). It sometimes drops off the MADI network entirely in such cases.
My Pulse 16 is connected via ADAT to my RME RayDAT PCIe card inside a Windows 11 PC pro audio workstation.
Also connected to the RME RayDAT via an AES digital detangler (Z-Systems) is a Crane Song HEDD 192 and Crane Song Avocet.
The whole system is rock solid, never misses a single sample of data and responds to sample rate changes made from the RME RayDAT instantly.
The RME can act as the Master Clock or the HEDD 192 can act as the Master Clock all over a combination of ADAT and AES with no BNC - rock solid sync.
(I don't need BNC because I don't record with the Pulse 16 and HEDD 192 at the same time)
I think the superb stability of my system comes from the RME RayDAT and RME's superior "SteadyClock" technology.