Quote:
Originally Posted by
XHipHop
β‘οΈ
Another late edit:
Owner of the blockchain gets a cut. Auction houses get a cut. There are so many ways to make it financially work.
People want to "own" virtual things and these brands that we revere around here have value to people.
One more time - the fundamental value of an NFT is to "own something unique". The fundamental value of a plugin is a tool to use.
Sure - there may be a very small market for people who just like to "have" things. Bit like hifi buffs who just want to own something, even if they only use it occasionally.
Scarcity is the value of NFT, but scarcity is a negative thing when it comes to tools. If I rely on a plugin, I want every studio I go to to have it. I want collaborators to be able to use it. I want to be able to recommend it to friends or students, or be able to get a 2nd copy if the facility I run uses it. What about if my computer dies or I lose my activation code/login?
None of those things appeal. No professional would actively "want" a plugin that can't be replaced easily. The concept of an NFT doesn't make sense if what you actually want is a tool - that's the fundamental misunderstanding.
Quote:
New content:
I'm not making a business proposal there are number combos that work. I was just giving you "a number higher than the numbers you gave me".
You can't make "higher numbers" than an open ended production run. It's logically impossible. Potentially, a limited sale value is always of lower value.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
XHipHop
β‘οΈ
I didn't say said developer would run it, and because of his fan base on le tubes - they would pay hard.
You keep setting up all of these straw men and making me knock them down.
I'm sorry - I don't mean to. You're not being very clear.
"I didn't say said developer would run it, and because of his fan base on le tubes - they would pay hard."
This makes no sense. What do you mean? Can you explain so I don't "straw man" you again"? This doesn't make any sense at all.