Just a little color commentary.
While I don't disagree that there can be some variance, I have absolute confidence that Neumann builds within spec. I also have to give a shout out to Neumann and Josephson for working on mint used, second-hand mics and happily doing it within their generous warranty period.
This is where things get interesting: "compared to what I'd expect a 67 to sound like." I have no doubt I could find a vintage 67 I like more than my current 67 Reissue but, it would be a one-off anomaly, differing from most other vintage 67s due to age, use, treatment and maintenance/repairs. I bought the reissue knowing this and, except for the internal electrical connection issue, I am and will remain in love with my mic as long as I don't run into too many additional sibilant vocalists, the current count is 3.
While I may still send my 67 to Klaus, having had it out to Neumann and hearing the 67 on a wide variety of voices, I can't say that I feel a need. The 67 Reissue is a phenomenal mic as expected, just not perfect on all voices or sources and, to my ear, if a singer is sibilant, it will be exaggerated by the 67 Reissue which was quite a surprise given the legend.
To be fair, Austin is ess-y even on the 715 which was designed specifically to minimize it. I have him working on that.
When a singer is not ess-y, for example Charlotte and Johanna, nothing I have heard is better than the 67 Reissue. It has excellent highs, the expected stellar mids and good lows. Lately, folks at the recording sessions, listening on the excellent monitoring chain, literally weep when Johanna and Charlotte sing on this mic. Sure, that is mostly because they are sweet teen girls pouring out their hearts in genuine praise but, the 67 lets that come through in a way I haven't heard any other mic allow and they are leaning into the incredible result.
I did take some time to pull out older recordings of Olivia on the Flea 49 and, to my surprise, she was ess-y on the 49 too, I just wasn't as sensitive to that at the time. Now, neither I nor the singers, can "un-hear" the S-es.
FWIW, I had Johanna do separate takes on the 67 and 715 and did not like her raw vocal on the 715. If I boost the highs, it could likely be great but the 67 doesn't need the boost. For Charlotte's sister Olivia, as mentioned, the 67 doesn't work, the 715 sounds like it was made for her.
This is an isolated vocal clip of Charlotte and Johanna, each on two parts, singing the final bridge and chorus of a song on the 67 Reissue. Nothing done to the vocals except compression and M7 reverb. You can feel the vibrations of the 67 mids, which I love. Again, two self-taught teens from a tiny pool of vocalists at a small Church in Alpharetta, GA. Oh yeah, as usual, a single take on each of the lead and harmony vocals they tracked. They started recording with me at 10 and 11 years old, experienced semi-pros now at 16 and 17. The new teams are starting at 9 years old. I don't know that we'll see a young musician equal to Charlotte for a long time but the new crew may be even better on vocals.
https://soundcloud.com/user-62615386...isolation-clip
Quote:
Originally Posted by
chessparov2.0
β‘οΈ
FWIW first U67 RI I tested/sang into, when they first came out was "anemic", compared to what I'd expect a 67 to sound like.
The next two I tried, sounded fantastic. Plenty of body/Low Mids/Mellow etc. IMHO there is some real world factory variance.
Chris