Quote:
Originally Posted by
apple-q
β‘οΈ
What I meant [. . .] strategy of de-valuating [. . .] waited for updates [. . .]
What will 883/Scorpio users have to expect? Mk. II models within the next 12 months costing hundreds or even thousands less? [. . .]
Anyway, I'm irritated for sure by this strategy and will watch SD from the sidelines for sure.
Thanks apple-q for the clarification.
I've worked 20+ years as a professional software dev and strategic business consultant, and so have gotten very used to devaluation - with hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on tech during that time. The residual of those investments survives only in the tangible and intangible value streams they helped to create.
Devaluation is less a strategy than a reality of tech that competitors [SD, Zoom, etc.] are forced to accept. Firms with a much more finely targeted [smaller] viable customer base [e.g. Sonosax, Cantar, etc.] may currently feel this pressure less. But at some point [as mass market tech improves], they will be hit as well.
While I've been pretty fortunate to work mostly at the high-end where budgets are fat, modern product dev can be pretty challenging. So, I usually cut a lot of slack [with respect to schedule] to those involved in producing tech.
I don't know anything about the proprietary strategies of any of these firms [none of them are my clients]. And I am always working under NDAs when dealing with these kinds of issues. But I hope you find the comments above helpful in some way.
Apologies for misunderstanding your perspective, and misstating facts in my initial response.
Best regards,
Ray H.