Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSweetener
I don't wanna be ignorant, but in the Rock samples the added hi end makes the hihat really annoying. I prefered the nontape versions. If I want brightness, it easier to dial the amount you want with a good EQ no?

Hello,
The 'passive' gain of high frequencies and Harmonic Overtone is adjustable.
Mostly (about 90%) material comes in which lacks brightness and needs refreshment, some shining air.
In case the file which is transferred to tape has too many high frequencies it is no problem to reduce them or to leave at the orignal level.
Basically I am aiming to bring more life and natural cohesion to the sound by rerecording to tape.
This gives me the advantages of a tape master without its usual drawbacks like limited bass response and the lack of transparency.
This tape machine offers frequency response which is beyond 28kHz, is ultra transparent, got strong mids and a beautiful bass.
All example files have been recorded with the same settingsand with levels close to 0dB, but normally the settings are adjusted in order to achieve the best results.
If required the highs can be lowered, yet for mastering more highs can sometimes be better because in case you want to reduce the highs you automatically have 2to3dB less noise.
About the price: a production of 70min will of course cost less than just one track.
Best regards
Dirk T. Jambor