Found this thread to post some new stuff about bitwig. I found some other threads about bitwig, but this one seemed the most appropriate.
Ott - It's Bitwig week...
They originally sent me a free copy when it first came out, in exchange for any technical feedback I could give them, so I dived in and really liked what I found. After a short while, though, it became apparent that it wasnβt entirely finished, so I sent them a couple of long emails detailing what I thought needed fixing [which they thanked me for] and put it away, hoping that the next version would feel a bit more complete.
v1.1 was released this week so I updated and gave it another try.
Iβm *very* happy to report that they have most definitely been putting the hours in, because the list of bugfixes is enormous, the list of improvements similarly so, and the new features are superb.
Now, I promise this isnβt some kind of greasy βendorsementβ thing, where they give me a free sequencer in exchange for glowing reviews on the internet. All they ever asked me for was technical feedback [which is more than any other software company has ever asked me for: none of the others have ever even answered my ****ing emails!] Iβm raving about it because I think it is the first genuinely innovative sequencer Iβve used since Ableton Live, thirteen years ago, and they seem genuinely interested in what their potential users think of their software.
The new Note Mod and Audio Mod devices are preposterously brilliant and the overall effect is that of a fully integrated environment, where everything does what you hope it is going to and there are none of the seemingly arbitrary blocks to creativity you find in other programs.
It just seems to suck the music out of you! I keep sitting down with it, to see if I can find its shortcomings and, within 45 minutes, coming up with these absurd musical Heath Robinson devices, where the volume of *this* is modulating the LFO speed of *that* and the midi notes of *this* are modulating the phaser depth of *that*β¦
Bitwig plainly owes a lot to the design innovations of Ableton Live and no doubt there is an element of them βriding on giantβs shouldersβ. Iβm aware of the connection between the two companies but they way Bitwig have taken the idea and turned it into everything I hoped Live would become, but didnβt, is very gratifying.
Tabbed projects, hybrid tracks, clips AND arrangement on the same screen, totally interconnectable and modular by design [and set to become more so, if their press is to be believed] and no ****ing MAX MSP in sight! The arrange window βreadsβ left to right, with the mixer controls on the left like EVERY other sequencer EVER [Ableton, wtf were you thinking?] and the plugin delay compensation works so well I completely forgot to think about it.
It would appear that Bitwig have been listening more attentively to Ableton Liveβs user-base than Ableton have.
If it proves to be as bulletproof stable as Ableton 9 has been [on my system anyway] I can see me using it live, and if they can resist filling it full of pointless DAW bloat [no ****ing score editor and multisampled oboes!] and keep it light and focussed, I think itβs going to go on to become a classic, and an incredible tool for the generation of live electronic music.
I also reckon there will have been some pretty terse developer meetings at Ableton Headquarters this week.
I like OTT a lot. He's a pretty amazing producer.
I'm happy enough with Ableton 9 (not even upgraded to .5 yet). I checked out bitwig on Linux, but meh, maybe in a few years time...
Still, I thought it was pretty interesting what he had to say, so thought I'd share it.