Quantcast
Shouldn't the flattest mic be the best? - Page 3 - Gearspace.com
The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
Shouldn't the flattest mic be the best?
Old 6th April 2018 | Show parent
  #61
Lives for gear
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightchef ➡️
What's the difference between "flat" and "uncolored"? I would certainly think of them as synonymous. Doesn't "color", as an attribute of any signal chain component, imply something that alters the spectral content of a signal? And isn't that the opposite of what we mean by "flat"?
yes as Frank Case mentioned - there are a lot of other parameters involved - most of which i would think being 'harmonics', 'phase' or what i might generally call 'smear' - things which in the end can also affect frequency response - you can also have a fairly 'flat' looking frequency response overall that is the result of many cumulative errors and problems. Let's look for example at a system where you have a tin can transducer in place of speakers - and you manage to somehow EQ that via room mods and placement (and eq of course) so you get something relatively 'flat' ... would THAT sound 'uncoloured'? I think no.
1
Share

Similar Threads

Thread / Thread Starter Replies / Views Last Post
replies: 98 views: 45622
Avatar for nst7
nst7 14th February 2014
replies: 259 views: 63944
Avatar for dizziness
dizziness 4 weeks ago
replies: 82 views: 10851
Avatar for Adorno
Adorno 25th January 2015
replies: 2704 views: 406922
Avatar for Diogo C
Diogo C 30th October 2015

Forum Jump
Forum Jump