Quantcast
Avicii's 'Wake Me Up' hits 200 million streams in Spotify. - Page 15 - Gearspace.com
The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
Avicii's 'Wake Me Up' hits 200 million streams in Spotify.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #421
Here for the gear
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by newguy1 ➡️
The key word from my post is "context." Objective perspectives require context.

In the objective context of contribution to music and historical significance, Bach is amazing.

In whatever subjective context anyone would like to view him in, he's whatever they want.
Saying "I don't like it, but it's amazing for a metal song" is not being subjective, then objective. It's being subjective twice. This person didn't say "I don't like it, but this band contributed greatly to the genre of heavy metal".
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #422
Lives for gear
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by newguy1 ➡️
The key word from my post is "context." Objective perspectives require context.

In the objective context of contribution to music and historical significance, Bach is amazing.
If there is not unanimous consensus on the stipulated qualifiers, then the supposed objectivity is erased. If someone doesn't value the musical elements Bach brought to the table, then he is meaningless to them, irrelevant with his lofty figured bass note barrage, and they will discard the refined aspects of his approach. Bach is then trashed and ignored.

It's not what I support, but in the realm of art, there is no universal objectivity, especially if a given artist wants to rebel against the "contribution to music and historical significance" manifested by the "Amazing" figure in question, who may just be viewed as a relic. An ornament. A dinosaur.

It's a sad but true scenario. A scenario I do not support in an artistic sense, for it is nihilistic, anarchistic and destructive.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #423
Lives for gear
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv_hiphop ➡️
Saying "I don't like it, but it's amazing for a metal song" is not being subjective, then objective. It's being subjective twice.
Correct !
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #424
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv_hiphop ➡️
Saying "I don't like it, but it's amazing for a metal song" is not being subjective, then objective. It's being subjective twice. This person didn't say "I don't like it, but this band contributed greatly to the genre of heavy metal".
True. Thanks for clarifying, I was assuming a song that significantly impacted the world within the context, not a random metal track.

Like "wake me up," objectively within the context of impacting the 2014 music world, it's fantastic, breaking records. Subjectively it's whatever you like.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #425
Lives for gear
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by newguy1 ➡️
Like "wake me up," objectively within context it's fantastic, breaking records.
Breaking records ? That's a numerical standard, which would be a quantifier, and much easier to get a unanimous consensus on.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #426
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by eldon2975 ➡️
Breaking records ? That's a numerical standard, which would be a quantifier, and much easier to get a unanimous consensus on.
Yep, it's a solid objective measure of how strongly the song connected with the 2014 music audience.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #427
Lives for gear
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by newguy1 ➡️
Yep, it's a solid objective measure of how strongly the song connected with the 2014 music audience.
And that numerical quantification (hypestorm crowd reaction) doesn't impose or necessitate any sort of universally mandatory qualitative assessment.
Old 7th March 2014
  #428
Here for the gear
 
🎧 5 years
One thing I have to give Avicii credit for is that he's a very smart guy. By collaborating with actual talented musicians, he's extended his 15 minutes into maybe an hour or two.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #429
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by eldon2975 ➡️
And that numerical quantification (hypestorm crowd reaction) doesn't impose or necessitate any sort of universally mandatory qualitative assessment.
It measures the quality of connect-ability, and whatever attributes lead it to be more connective, in the context of 2014 music. That is a universal fact. It's not a measure of anything else though.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #430
Lives for gear
 
🎧 5 years
Ultimately, people are entitled to make their opinionated qualitative assessment based on their personal preferences, frame of reference and relative judgmental standards. IOW, they are entitled to entirely ignore sales numbers if they so please, and just evaluate the content according to what they value as relatively important to the paradigm they want to build.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #431
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by eldon2975 ➡️
Ultimately, people are entitled to make their opinionated qualitative assessment based on their personal preferences, frame of reference and relative judgmental standards. IOW, they are entitled to entirely ignore sales numbers if they so please, and just evaluate the content according to what they value as relatively important to the paradigm they want to build.
Yes. That would be the subjective side of things.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #432
Lives for gear
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by newguy1 ➡️
It measures the quality of connect-ability, and whatever attributes lead it to be more connective, in the context of 2014 music. That is a universal fact. It's not a measure of anything else though.
"Connect-ability" is fleeting, and not necessarily of predominant importance. You might value it more than others though, as they might value it less than you. If you want to worship at the alter of record sales, then go ahead and pursue the social-numerical frenzy.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #433
Lives for gear
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by newguy1 ➡️
Yes. That would be the subjective side of things.
So, learn to separate the extremely objective numerical realm from the deeper and more nebulous subjective realm.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #434
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by eldon2975 ➡️
"Connect-ability" is fleeting, and not necessarily of predominant importance. You might value it more than others though, as they might value it less than you. If you want to worship at the alter of record sales, then go ahead and pursue the social-numerical frenzy.
I was talking objective measurements and nothing more. Reading comprehension. .
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #435
Lives for gear
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by newguy1 ➡️
I was talking objective measurements and nothing more. Reading comprehension. .
It's more a matter of extrapolation than comprehension, something you don't comprehend very well.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #436
Lives for gear
 
🎧 5 years
I have noticed newguy1 tends to want to link (and confuse) quantitative assessments with qualitative ones. Best to separate the 2.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #437
Gear Head
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by newguy1 ➡️
I was talking objective measurements and nothing more. Reading comprehension. .
+1 for newguy. I agree with many of your points, eldon, but you really did miss what newguy was saying.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #438
Lives for gear
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by fidelity castro ➡️
+1 for newguy. I agree with many of your points, eldon, but you really did miss what newguy was saying.
Actually, no, the larger picture (and great danger) is his (hopefully previous, not continual) implication that quantifiable sales numbers demand respect in the realm of quality assessments. They are mutually distinct.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #439
Gear Head
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by eldon2975 ➡️
Actually, no, the larger picture (and great danger) is his (hopefully previous, not continual) implication that quantifiable sales numbers demand respect in the realm of quality assessments. They are mutually distinct.
I don't see where he inferred anything about the actual quality of the song from the sales numbers. He's just saying that the high sales show that the song connected with a huge audience.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #440
Lives for gear
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by fidelity castro ➡️
I don't see where he inferred anything about the actual quality of the song from the sales numbers. He's just saying that the high sales show that the song connected with a huge audience.
He has stated the obvious then ? That higher sales numbers = more people connect to the song ? Wow. What insight ! Who ever countered that ?

He still has demonstrated a sly, implicit, barely noticeable but longstanding tendency to want numerical impact recognition to be followed up by subsequent praise in the area of qualitative assessment.

As long as it's established that the latter doesn't have to follow the former.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #441
Here for the gear
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by eldon2975 ➡️
He has stated the obvious then ? That higher sales numbers = more people connect to the song ? Wow. What insight ! Who ever countered that ?

He still has demonstrated a sly, implicit, barely noticeable but longstanding tendency to want numerical impact recognition to be followed up by subsequent praise in the area of qualitative assessment.

As long as it's established that the latter doesn't have to follow the former.
I don't think you'll get anywhere with him. Another factor to consider is that perhaps working in pop for so long has altered his taste negatively, beyond recovery.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #442
Lives for gear
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv_hiphop ➡️
I don't think you'll get anywhere with him. Another factor to consider is that perhaps working in pop for so long has altered his taste negatively, beyond recovery.
That's a distinct possibility I can't casually dismiss.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #443
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by fidelity castro ➡️
. I agree with many of your points, eldon, but you really did miss what newguy was saying.
I agree with many of his points as well. My sole issue is that he's aggressively attacking a misrepresentation of what I and a few others on here are saying.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #444
Gear Guru
Quote:
Originally Posted by newguy1 ➡️
I agree with many of his points as well. My sole issue is that he's aggressively attacking a misrepresentation of what I and a few others on here are saying.
Haha don't argue with someone who likes to argue!!
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #445
Here for the gear
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Lago ➡️
Haha don't argue with someone who likes to argue!!
Your opinions on good pop are virtually meaningless to me, sad to say.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #446
Gear Guru
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv_hiphop ➡️
Your opinions on good pop are virtually meaningless to me, sad to say.
Haha nice, thanks. Whoever you are.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #447
Lives for gear
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by newguy1 ➡️
My sole issue is that he's aggressively attacking a misrepresentation of what I and a few others on here are saying.
It's not a total misrepresentation though, it is at most, a slightly embellished characterization enhanced with a jazz improvisation style supplemented by justifiably extrapolated anticipation of your contribution to pop music paradigm stagnation.

Just because I'm not delivering verbatim quote softballs, in the realm of conversational checkers (adhering strictly to elementary notions of 1-dimensional logical discourse), doesn't mean I'm necessarily at the level of total misrepresentation.

IOW, it's not all about presumed appropriate argumentative tactics, but is more about long-term strategy and subsequent pop music paradigm impact.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #448
Lives for gear
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Lago ➡️
Haha don't argue with someone who likes to argue!!
But the person you happen to be advising not to argue (newguy1) actually loves to argue in the most presumptuously dogmatic, conventionally conformist, unimaginatively shallow, and sporadically Randian manner possible.
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #449
Lives for gear
 
Carnalia Barcus's Avatar
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by creegstor ➡️
No. It's really not.
Yes, it really is. This is a fact about what the world is like, about what sorts of things there are in the world and where they're located. It's also about the upshots of those facts, about what it even refers to to be right or wrong about something, etc.
Quote:
Bach was good.
Where is "Bach is good" located? What is it a property of and/or what are the specific properties?
Old 7th March 2014 | Show parent
  #450
Lives for gear
 
Carnalia Barcus's Avatar
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by cetera ➡️
wow.. uh to rewind a bit: i think you can objectively define what makes a good pop song!
Since your comments below suggest to me that you're not using a definition I recognize, can I ask you how you're defining "objective"?
📝 Reply
Post Reply

Welcome to the Gearspace Pro Audio Community!

Registration benefits include:
  • The ability to reply to and create new discussions
  • Access to members-only giveaways & competitions
  • Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As
  • Access to members-only sub forum discussions
  • Access to members-only Chat Room
  • Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio Classifieds for only USD $20/year
  • Promote your eBay auctions and Reverb.com listings for free
  • Remove this message!
You need an account to post a reply. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered.


 
 
Slide to join now Processing…

Forum Jump
Forum Jump