The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
Help me out with this confusion
Old 10th May 2006
Lives for gear
🎧 15 years
Help me out with this confusion

Cubase SX + 44,[email protected] > Nuendo + [email protected]

Is Cubase SX better sounding than Nuendo because I use a lower sample rate or is it because I'm using Cubase SX and not Nuendo?

Both my brother and I am sure about the fact that Cubase SX sounds better, more musical sounding and a bit less muddy. When I did low level performance measurements the difference between Cubase and Nuendo was on the atomic level, the biggest difference was the overall noise frequency location. That plus the fact that I have earlier noticed that the velocity response is more muddy when I run at 96KHz sample rate makes me bet on the sample rate rather than on the DAW software. I use an RME Fireface 800 converter.

Or could the combination be what makes the difference?!
📝 Reply

Similar Threads

Thread / Thread Starter Replies / Views Last Post
replies: 63 views: 7880
Avatar for RME Support
RME Support 17th July 2006
replies: 4610 views: 606826
Avatar for cabooter
cabooter 4 weeks ago
replies: 6268 views: 943270
Avatar for augustusarnone
augustusarnone 4 days ago
replies: 97 views: 35286
Avatar for mowmow
mowmow 15th September 2010
Post Reply

Welcome to the Gearspace Pro Audio Community!

Registration benefits include:
  • The ability to reply to and create new discussions
  • Access to members-only giveaways & competitions
  • Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As
  • Access to members-only sub forum discussions
  • Access to members-only Chat Room
  • Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio Classifieds for only USD $20/year
  • Promote your eBay auctions and listings for free
  • Remove this message!
You need an account to post a reply. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered.

Slide to join now Processing…

Forum Jump
Forum Jump