Quantcast
De-essers. Massey Vs UAD - Gearspace.com
The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
De-essers. Massey Vs UAD
Old 17th November 2009
  #1
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
De-essers. Massey Vs UAD

Has anyone used both of these and prefer either?

If so why?
Old 18th November 2009
  #2
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
I havent used any UAD stuff, but I can say without a doubt that the Massey DeEsser is unbelievable. And with the ridiculous affordability, why not, for serious?
Old 18th November 2009 | Show parent
  #3
Lives for gear
 
s.d.finley's Avatar
 
🎧 15 years
I have both and prefer the Massey. Both have "listen" functions which is great. I prefer to use the UAD cards for more character plug ins; 88RS, 1073, et al.
Massey is much cheaper, and very light on the cpu usage. If you need AU or VST and have a UAD card, demo the perc de-esser. Hell, demo both!
📝 Reply
Post Reply

Welcome to the Gearspace Pro Audio Community!

Registration benefits include:
  • The ability to reply to and create new discussions
  • Access to members-only giveaways & competitions
  • Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As
  • Access to members-only sub forum discussions
  • Access to members-only Chat Room
  • Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio Classifieds for only USD $20/year
  • Promote your eBay auctions and Reverb.com listings for free
  • Remove this message!
You need an account to post a reply. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered.


 
 
Slide to join now Processing…

Forum Jump
Forum Jump