If these are aren't pearls of wisdom...I don't know what is?

But Bob, its like the saying goes "casting pearls to swine".

heh

I have to agree with Bob. My experience as a former promoter and a former bar owner and a musician, and as a recordist, all leads me to believe that the band that can draw a crowd will invariably do much better at getting gigs and label interest, then the band with the kick ass Record. That said it's a smart move for a touring band to have product to sell, and that includes the best recording they can afford to make. If the record is good it's a bonus, that can aid in your negotiating if a label expresses interest, which they won't if you have not demonstrated that you can draw a crowd consistently. So I encourage the bands I work with to get together product and to sell it at gigs. 10 cds sold at each gig can make the difference between riding to the gig in a beater or reliable transportation.
Also most bar owners, and festival bookers I know now want to see some product from the band before they will book them. It's all about building a solid fan base, the odd freebe from the stage can also be a great promo. take care Logan

Yeah, basically.

Look at what major labels do best:
1) Mass production
2) Distribution
3) Promotion

Now, look at what they do worst:
1) Creative vision
2) Artist development
3) Production

Do you see an opportunity in that scenario? A void that needs to be filled in the "supply/demand" scheme of things?

Labels are now publishing/distribution houses. They cannot be expected to "create" or "nuture" talent. We must do that work...and we can. We have the tools.

It's just a matter of going there...

That's why I've been hoping for more "Sam Phillips/Berry Gordy"
kind of label owners...

Chris