Quote:
Originally Posted by
73mk2
β‘οΈ
Below is my description for LDC mics:
Warbler (also called Warbler I), Warbler MKID and GZ67fet: airy, sounds like vintage U87
Warbler MKII, Warbler MKIID and GZ47fet: smooth and balanced, sounds like vintage U47fet
GZ47fet V: smoother top end than GZ47fet
Warbler MKIII, Warbler MKIIID and GZ12fet: warm and bright, sounds like vintage C12
Warbler MKIV, Warbler MKIVD and GZ251fet: warm and airy, sounds like vintage ELAM251
Warbler MKV: warm and smooth, a little tight, sounds like smoother or darker ELAM251
Warbler MKVI and Warbler MKVID: bright for modern music, sounds like vintage U87 too"
These mics are always compared to u87s, 251s, c800s, etc.... I find these comparisons practically worthless since I am not in the market for a $4000+ mic.
I assume I'm not alone here?
Conventional wisdom would suggest that a more helpful/practical comparison would be between other mics in a similar price point, and there usability in a mix. Has anyone had an opportunity to use these warblers side by side with some of the more well known products like an AT 4033, 4047, AKG c214, Shure ksm32, ksm44, Rode nt1a, nt2, Blue baby bottle, etc...
And don't give me any sh** about price doesn't matter. Yes, some mics perform better than their price suggests, but let's be real here: Price does matter to anyone with limited resources or on a budget.
So bang for buck, how do the warblers stack up?
?