Quote:
Originally Posted by
UnMix Studio
➡️
Sounds good. Thanks for the info and details.
Not sure if you heard the Neuman KH310 (aware they not same. passive vs active etc...) but if you heard both, which would you prefer?
Replying on my personal account!
I moved from KH310’s to One18’s. I’ve been a frequent poster in this thread about the switch, but to summarise my thoughts:
KH310:
- sound bigger, more impressive to clients
- much more microdetail, quite a zoomed in presentation
- more sub low end with a tighter low end presentation
- more forward high mids
- better at showing saturation - was like i could hear individual grains of distortion
- boring and uninspiring. devoid of character (someone here described them very accurately as a studio monitor for universities)
One18:
- better imaging and phantom centre
- better dynamics, both macro and micro
- noticeably better phase coherence
- potentially faster overall
- superior depth, easier to hear reverb and delay trails
- high frequencies easier to differentiate from one another
- more of a zoomed out presentation
- much more musical and inspiring
I would implore you to hear them both in the same space as they’re quite different presentations. KH310 is more typical studio monitor voicing.