Originally Posted by joeq ➡️

That is absolutely not part of science. The burden of proof is on you. The burden of extraordinary proof is on the people who have made the extraordinary claims.

"what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."

I see this actually as you finally admitting defeat. You have no evidence for your crackpot ideas about sound; you have gotten your ass kicked in all 'debate' so far; everyone is laughing at you. So now you are reduced to challenging people to "disprove" a silly idea that comes with no evidence to back it up other than your say-so. That's not how it works.

My 'theory' is that you are a bot. Disprove my theory.

"Science" is under no obligation to disprove every piece of bullshit that the crackpots come up with. I don't have to prove that "there is no Bigfoot", the Sasquatch 'researchers' have to prove there IS a Bigfoot.