Quote:
Originally Posted by
DanDan
➡️
Is that a Royal We Jens? I have repeatedly referred to the first cycle emanating from the Kick Drum, half of which predominates. I have been calling it a Wave FRONT. You keep restating 'Low Frequency Sound'. It is a bit off to refer to something I am not talking about in order to generate a false contradiction. In English we call this The Straw Man Argument.
That is an absolutely nonsensical misinterpretation of what I have said.
Again, I said that the above mentioned WaveFront will be represented by a full range speaker. Furthermore if that speaker is on one side, the direction from which the blast comes will be felt, and seen if a candle flame or piece of paper is in the path.
Sorry Jens I will not. All you need to do to fully understand is simply listen.
Play the sample I supplied on one side only. Remove everything above 80Hz if you wish. Close your eyes and get someone to shift the sound over to the other speaker. You will reliably identify the source every time.
You haven't addressed the problem associated with headphone listening. Try listening to
this on Cans. Note where the Kick is. Then come back to me about recommending Mono LF be imposed when Mastering.
I don't understand the last line in your post. But I know what you and Mike are getting at. I believe regular GS readers and Mods do.
DD
So, just to be clear;
Are you saying that the sound of a kick drum cannot be broken down into separate sine waves and distributed to individual drivers/channels? What would Fourier say about that?
And that this would somehow explain that a kick drum reproduced by a normal loudspeaker would be directional even for low frequencies?
Or are you simply saying that low frequencies can be localized (in a normal listening room) even if all the current research says no?