The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
Kali Audio LP-6
4.15 4.15 out of 5, based on 3 Reviews

Accurate and affordable active monitors.

4th April 2019

Kali Audio LP-6 by Arthur Stone

Kali Audio LP-6

The Kali LP-6:
A 2-way powered studio monitor: The LP stands for Lone Pine (a town in California's East Sierra near Mt. Whitney); the area's town names will be a theme for a range of Kali monitors. Kali are based in Los Angeles.

Birth of Gonzo:
Sometimes I'm more of a participant than a reviewer; events take on a life of their own. I just try to document what happened at a given time and place.

For example: this is the second Kali LP-6 review I've written. The first 'disappeared' in my computer. It was a good 5* review: accurate and non-fatiguing active monitors with good linear extension. Modern 'fun' sound. The vibe I get from the Kali Audio LP-6 is that of an expensive monitor built to a cost. Arguably a bit 'plastic-looking' but certainly not plastic-sounding. Good feature set. Low price.

Price (each): £150 UK/ 170 Euros/$170 US (approx. store prices)

Powered: Yes
Amplifier Class: D
Power Configuration: Bi-Amped
LF Power: 40 W
HF Power: 40 W
Total Power: 80 W
LF Driver: 6.5" Woofer
HF Driver: 1" Soft Dome Tweeter
Freq. Response: (-10 dB) 39 Hz - 25 kHz
Frequency Range: (±3 dB) 47 Hz - 21 kHz
Crossover: 1.5 kHz
Listening Distance: (85 dB Continuous, 20 dB headroom) 2.2Meters
Max SPL: 112 dB
System THD (94 dB @ 1 M):<3% 80 Hz - 1.7 kHz <2% above 1.7 kHz
Unbalanced Inputs: 1 x RCA
Balanced Inputs:**1 x TRS, 1 x XLR
TRS/XLR Input Sensitivity:*+4 dB
RCA Input Sensitivity: -10 dB
HF Trim: -2 dB, ±0 dB, +2 dB
LF Trim: -2 dB, ±0 dB, +2 dB
Boundary EQ Settings: Free space (On stands, away from walls)
On stands, within .5 meters of a wall
On stands, against a wall
Meter bridge
Wall Mount
On a desk, away from walls
On a desk, within .5 meters of a wall
On a desk, against a wall

Enclosure: Front Ported

Height:14.125 Inches (35.9 cm)
Width: 8.75 Inches (22.2 cm)
Depth:10.25 Inches (26 cm)

Product Weight:15.54 lbs (7.01 kg)
Shipping Weight:18 lbs (8.16 kg)

3D Waveguide Mojo:
I don't know too much about waveguides. Kali describe the LP-6 waveguide as:
The 3-D Imaging Waveguide allows you to hear a 3-D soundstage from a stereo pair of speakers. By matching the shape of the waveguide to the interactions of the HF and LF drivers, this waveguide produces a coherent stereo image that is wider, taller, and deeper than the space where the speakers are placed.
The LP-6 accomplishes this by ensuring that the speaker’s reflected sound matches its direct sound. Every time you hear a loudspeaker, you're hearing both the direct sound from the speaker, and reflections from the speaker's signal bouncing off of objects in the room.
When those reflections are congruent with the direct sound from the speaker, listeners perceive a better sound overall, and are able to make out very subtle details like where microphones are placed in a room.
Yes. Mojo. Not sure how exactly a waveguide achieves alignment of direct and reflected sound but I will be finding out soon.

The low noise port is a little easier to conceptualize: if air leaves the port at different speeds across the surface it can create unwanted sound ('chuffing') so Kali have designed the LP-6 to have a consistent pressure across the whole port. It certainly sounded silent and didn't disturb the independent soundstage in the room; I had no sense of noise artifacts tying the sound to the monitor and destroying the illusion.

Another easy-to-grasp engineering concept is that the 6” woofer is powered by a large, powerful magnet and voice coil leading to more 'oomph.'

Who is Kali?
There's a strong JBL heritage with the Kali team progressing to focus on products in a way larger corporations cannot; importantly the trickle-down know-how, transferable skillset, and design/manufacturing expertise of, in part, an engineering legend, JBL, continues in a new and original product.

Kali Audio was formed by a group of friends who met while working together at JBL Professional. Per-haps the best known member of our team is Charles Sprinkle, who engineered JBL’s M2, 7-Series, and 3-Series monitors. He also had a large role on the EON 615 and the EON ONE.
The idea behind the low-cost and high-quality LP-6's is to introduce the Kali brand and capability to a wide-range of listeners. Although Kali recommend the LP-6's for 'first monitors' and project studios there is also capability to deliver the bandwidth and accuracy needed for professional environments; having heard the LP-6's alongside more expensive monitors I think that Kali have achieved their aim.

Warren Huart has recommended the Kali's and the interview with Charles Sprinkle of Kali is linked here.

Kali's Sound:
Continuing the Gonzo-review style, I'll try to convey how the LP-6's sound in words...despite the futility of doing so. What I should say is: “go listen to a demo.”

The LP-6's sound impressive. They sound 'new' and they have an edge that isn't plastic but more of an high-quality vinyl. There's a lot of vibrancy and dynamic bounce but not like a beach ball.

They were a bit cheeky but not brash or rude. If, during blind-testing, I was unaware they were low-cost 'plastic' monitors and you told me they had wooden cabinets and cost several times the price then I might have believed you. In the sweet-spot (not too quiet/not too loud) there's a density and presence and solid soundstage that makes them hard to distinguish from expensive monitors.

I mixed through them, and 'leisure-listened' (vinyl: David Bowie's Ziggy Stardust, John Mayall The Turning Point sounded good but the Kali's really came alive with 12” Goa trance and various techno/DnB). The Kali's worked well with 'devices' and consumer-gear in addition to the more usual studio configuration connected to an audio interface. In fact Kali recommend the LP-6 as suitable for home hi-fi and consumer entertainment systems and, sonically, IME they are perfect for this role (especially with the room tuning modes) although they are quite bulky compared to the latest generations of media playback systems.

I didn't get the same sense of efficiency for tracking (along to a mix in a DAW session) as I do with more expensive and powerful monitors but with careful room placement and testing they are certainly workable (especially given their very reasonable price). I recorded session musician Rob The Guitar, DI'd into an UA Apollo x8p with Tube Screamer and Marshall 'real-time' plug-ins, against a dense mix and I think Rob would have gelled better (in terms of his monitoring) with a slightly larger monitor. Perhaps the upcoming LP-8 would have been more suitable for tracking rock music?

Kali say that they have been designed for moderate and safe working levels (85 dB @ 2.2 metres) with enough headroom (20 dB) to allow for sharp, dynamic sounds like drum hits or gun shots; there is a safety limiter to prevent damage to the speakers; this causes distortion (an indication the limiter is operating) but I didn't notice this in the wide sweet-spot during my sessions.

With a bit of adaptation (ear training for workflow nuances) these are perfectly workable monitors in the accuracy they give within quite a wide frequency range; and good linearity at a range of volume. Inside the sweetspot the LP-6's shared many similarities to more expensive monitors. Outside of the wide sweet spot the soundstage edge is noticeable with a little smeared treble energy although the bass image is remarkably resilient.

I work at quite modest domestic sound levels (with occasional 'peaks' for testing or enjoyment) and working alone in a medium-sized room the LP-6's had adequate power and projection but for tracking with more people in the room I'd be interested in hearing the LP-8's.

Wrapping it up:
So it was all a bit of a daze: the first review was lost, mid-hibernation season here in MiddleEarth, and a mild come-down from the festivities.
Nothing seemed bad about the Kali LP-6's – they felt (and sounded) like expensive high-end monitors built to a cost – which is what they are.

Good fortune to Kali; an impressive entry to the market and sign of exciting future products.

Gearslutz Score.
Sound Quality 5/5 For the money, very good indeed. For any money: not bad at all. The LP-6 sounds good and is relatively accurate. Relatively non-fatiguing.
Features: 5/5 Use of rear dip-switches allows full feature set without the cost. Solid weight and durable build. Good EQ. Good manual and info from Kali.
Ease of Use 5/5 OK the dips are a little fiddly to start but once you've set up then the only potential issue ia the rear power switch. Sonically I didn't feel like I was fighting the balance or compensating for an obvious deficiency in the monitor.
Bang-for-Buck 5/5 Excellent if you need first monitors, a second check, or a third set.

Credits and links:
Kali Audio — Lone Pine Detail
Photos courtesy of Kali Audio; additional photos by Arthur Stone.

Mount Whitney By Geographer (talk · contribs) - Transferred from en.wikipedia to Commons by Zeimusu., CC BY 1.0, File:Mount Whitney 2003-03-25.jpg - Wikimedia Commons

Attached Thumbnails
Kali Audio LP-6-front-blue.png   Kali Audio LP-6-kali-front.png   Kali Audio LP-6-kali-panel.png   Kali Audio LP-6-kali-rear-2.png   Kali Audio LP-6-kali-rear.png  

Kali Audio LP-6-kali-side.png   Kali Audio LP-6-kali-trio.png   Kali Audio LP-6-mount-whitney.png  
Last edited by Arthur Stone; 5th April 2019 at 12:58 AM..

  • 7
16th June 2020

Kali Audio LP-6 by Woodhouse

  • Sound Quality 5 out of 5
  • Ease of use 5 out of 5
  • Features 4 out of 5
  • Bang for buck 5 out of 5
  • Overall: 4.75
Kali Audio LP-6

I got the LP6 to replace my Eve Audio monitors that were starting to malfunction. Budget monitors are getting better. I like a few things about these.. A big soundstage, 3d imaging with a nice height and depth, and the overall evenness in the sound. There is good quality mids. Bass is nice although I would love a sub. The dynamics is also really good for this price. While programming drums , its easy to hear if the kick or the snare is punching too hard or too soft; actually easier than I can hear on the eves. There is no ear fatigue.

While the eves sound more beautiful and faster, the lp6 reveals more of what is wrong and that makes it a better mixing monitor in my opinion. From what I understand from the comparison, I feel that a substantial upgrade from the lp6 lies only in the 2000$ price category of monitors.
One negative about these is that so far in my approximately 1 year of use, one of the monitors has gone to stand by and turned back on about 6 or 7 times. Other than that really happy with the purchase.

  • 1
7th April 2021

Kali Audio LP-6 by Hrhr

  • Sound Quality 2 out of 5
  • Ease of use 3 out of 5
  • Features 4 out of 5
  • Bang for buck 2 out of 5
  • Overall: 2.75
Kali Audio LP-6

In my history of buying studio monitors, I've made a mistake of listening to hype on forums in past, which lead me to selling monitors I really liked and buying monitors, which I really hated.

What I've learned is, that very rarely the opinion on studio monitors that people share on the internet will be fully accurate. My guess is, that these reviews are often written by people who didn't own any studio monitors before, that's why they're so happy with their first monitors.

So I learned that to ALWAYS only trust my own ears, not forum posts, and ignore the hype that surrounds certain models/brands.

Now, about Kali LP-6s...
I've recently decided to buy a second set of monitors which will compliment my YAMAHA MSP5s.

Having all the experience with inaccurate opinions about monitors in past, I decided to buy 3 sets of studio monitors that are currently praised on the forums and in the reviews :
- Kali LP-6
- Adam T5V
- JBL 305p mkII (still waiting for them to be shipped)

...and listen to them myself in my home studio

I've compared Kali LP-6 and T5V monitors today at my home. Kali: first impression was, to put it mildly, not good. Barely any detail, reverb tails were barely hearable. Transient response was mediocre. Bass and low mids were flabby, all was "blurred". Next were the T5Vs: much much better detail & transient response. Much better detail in bass/low mids, there is less "blur" in this region. Actually they remind me very much of my Yamaha MSP5 monitors, thought the T5V go lower. MSP5's do have a very slight edge in detail/transient response and feeling of "richness" in my opinion (combined with sub). Even though both Kali LP-6 and T5V hiss, it's not that bad. On Kali's it is sometimes noticeable, on T5V's the hiss level is lower. Both Yamaha and Adam's have this "focus" on midrange, as if Adams' "main focus" was in area of 1,5-2kHz, while for Yamahas' it would be around 3-4kHz. Not everyone will like such analytical sound, it can be tiring, but I do like it. If you like relaxed, soft, flabby sound without too much detail you might like Kalis. I don't like their sound at all. I would not be able to mix on them. T5V's feel like "real" monitors on the other hand with good detail.

Build quality & looks: I much prefer the look of Adams. They look really pro/sexy/classy at the same time The front panel of Kali's have this sort of dated look to it. Materials look better on Adams (front panel, the sides and rear is comparable on both monitors).

Soon I will also test the famous JBL 305p mkII Very curious how they sound after all the good stuff I read about them.