The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
HEDD Type 20
5 5 out of 5, based on 2 Reviews

Best monitor I've tried to date.

5th February 2019

HEDD Type 20 by Arthur Stone

HEDD Type 20

The HEDD Type-20 is a 3-way active studio monitor with analogue inputs and an optional digital connection module. A software component is also available – The Linearizer – which phase corrects the source which in turn places less stress on the hardware components and improves the sound.

Feed Your HEDD:
Sometimes the reviews write themselves...or present ideas, through chance and synchronicity.

I'd finished the review and packed away the HEDD Type-20's and decided they were the best monitors I'd heard in my room: dynamics, tone, soundstage. I wanted to double-check, so I re-unboxed and set them up.

The doorbell rang. It was the UPS guy come to collect the review pair of Kali LP-6's. Pleasant chap and looking at the box and reading the lettering, he said: 'Professional studio monitors eh?'

He was decent enough to say this in a non-belittling way, without any contempt but I judged his comment as from someone who knew something about audio and gear. My hunch proved correct.

I said: “Are you into audio and gear?” He laughed and told me about his high-end record deck, home system and penchant for classic vinyl re-releases. My opening gambit was that vinyl has 16 times the resolution of mp3 and we proceeded to discuss the resurgence of classic vinyl reproduction. We could have talked for hours and we both knew we were gear-buds for life.

In fairness to Kali, they deserve the title of 'pro' and that news was probably off UPS guys audiophile radar. I'm sure he googled them later anyway.

What sealed the deal, in establishing a shared passion for audio and gear, was when I said: “I've got some HEDD Type-20's upstairs.” UPS guy looked impressed at the mention of the HEDD name and he knew 'Type-20' too. I said: “HEDD have just released Main Towers and a huge smile came on his face. We nodded respectfully and UPS guy drove off into the vinyl sunset.

I keep mis-remembering my room dimensions and publishing different sizes in each review. Is it really important? I mean building materials, room shape and mass dampening, absorption coefficients of fixtures and furnishings, atmospheric and environmental factors, all come into play...and different rooms will sound different despite sharing dimensions whatever we interpret the laws of physics to say.

The actual dimensions are: 12' (3.7m) wide with an open door leading to a 15' deep hall with rooms off either side (my echo chamber) and a large window the other side (curtains used to sonically brighten or darken the room for tracking); the depth is 10' with 2 x 2' deep recesses on either side of chimney breast These recesses are part filled with books, vinyl and diffusers and resonators.

I'm sitting facing the wide section wall with the diffusers behind and mirror points covered with air-gapped acoustic fibre tiles and a ceiling cloud.

The 8' ceiling is thick plasterboard leading to a raised loft. The room is anchored to the mass of the small apartment building and the structure is formed from a solid reinforced concrete frame with concrete blocks forming partitions and room, all finished in plaster.

Good to go:
I mention this because the HEDD Type-20's 'reacted' with my room in a way that no other monitor I've tried has; energy did not seem to be wasted and transferred into the building/room structure. The bass appeared in a very structured, unforced way. Very clear and natural without the room responding as usual.
The soundstage was not as bright as other ribbon-tweetered monitors I've tried – a little less obviously present, more naturalistic, slightly-less fatiguing and kinda invisible as a source of the wide-expansive (but un-hyped) soundstage. This was a 5' nearfield triangle set-up close to the front wall. I think I could have set them back up to 6-8' further back – the power and stability of image was there – and I did some listening from the rear wall sofa spot which confirmed this.

In Use:
The first thing to say is that the HEDD Type-20 is a professional instrument in terms of design and construction, features and controls, and also in that it is capable of conveying the same sonic character as a fine musical instrument.

Even with less well-produced or technically inferior source material there is still a sense of realism and plausibility I don't hear with other monitors I've tried/reviewed. Sound this good comes at a prime spot on the cost-benefit curve. In general, I had total confidence in the Type-20's; I didn't feel I needed a sub and there was plenty of SPL on offer.

That's not to say that you can't hear when something is wrong; you do – but equally what is right is clear.

As with other professional 3-way studio monitors it was impossible to determine which sound was coming from which speaker (or even from the speakers); the impression was of being immersed in a seamless, expansive soundstage: deep front to-back and endless sides. The mono centre was super-strong – magnetic – even with the monitors set wide. I noticed no 'high ceiling' or any cut-off between hearing and physically feeling the sub-bass in my body. There is enough physical depth and weight to effortlessly project bass and sub bass. It tickled sometimes!

Basket Ø 7.2" (182mm)
Voice coil Ø 2" (51mm)
Cone material: UHC cone (Ultra Honeycomb Composite)

Basket Ø 4.7" (120mm)
Voice coil Ø 1.25 " (32mm)
Cone material: UHC cone (Ultra Honeycomb Composite)

Type: HEDD AMT (HEDD Air Motion Transformer)
Equiv. Diaphragm Ø 2" (56mm)

Input connectors:
Analog balanced/ unbalanced

Digital/HEDD Bridge Options: Dante / Audio-over-IP

General data
Amplification (ICEpower®) 3 x 300W
Input gain -30dB … +6dB
High Shelf EQ > 2kHz*±4dB (at 20kHz)
Low Shelf EQ < 200Hz ±4dB (at 50Hz)
Frequency response 32Hz - 50kHz
THD 90dB/1m > 100Hz ≤0.5%
Max SPL sine wave 100Hz - 3kHz /1m ≥110dB
Max SPL peak per pair at 1m ≥120dB
Crossover frequencies 250Hz / 2.5kHz
Input impedance balanced / unbalanced 10kΩ / 47kΩ
Weight 15kg
Height x Width x Depth 280mm x 358mm x 338mm
Warranty 2 years
Physically the HEDD Type-20's are deep and hefty; a strong person could lift 2 and carry them upstairs (disclaimer: do not do this!) but you'd probably want a tea break after. Good-quality stands are recommended but the Type-20's are a comfortable size/weight for a console bridge, strong desk or rugged temporary/remote set-up.

My only real criticism of the HEDD Type-20's is the monitor self-noise (a pleasing or non-jarring white noise sound) that can be heard at around 3ft/1m in a quiet room; beyond that distance I wasn't aware of hearing or sensing it. In fact, that was the sound of the audio interface – a Focusrite Saffire. I switched to the KRK Ergo monitor controller and the noise was only audible at around 12”/0.3metre and well under the noise floor of my 'quiet PC.'

I guess that the only other minor (but important) gripe is the undetented control dials on the rear which are difficult to calibrate unless the monitor is turned around; a piece of tape attached to a flat-head screwdriver shaft can be used as a marker for easier calibration. The potentiometer (Phillips Head-slotted) head is softish plastic – perhaps for electrical reasons? - and showed some signs of wear and tear; generally, the build-quality is robust but the finishings and surfaces are quite delicate and extra care should be taken when moving or adjusting. The Type-20 scuffs easily but the rubberised-coating has a velvety texture, softly refracts the light and it helps the monitor physically fade into the distance.

The power switch is on the rear, along with the IEC power inlet; the XLR/RCA inputs (as well as the digital option slot) cover most bases and enabling domestic home hi-fi or second set or remote use, or connecting with unbalanced professional gear; the XLR is balanced. HEDD have adopted the digital module as a way to keep technologically-current and widen application of the range.

Speakers' Corner:
The Air Motion transformer (AMT) is unique design that differs from regular tweeters/speakers in that it can exceed a 1:1 diaphragm-to-air-motion ratio by four times. Hand-wound by craftsmen. HEDD have further evolved this classic design by using a strong magnetic field to lower distortion and intermodulation; with a special wave guide 2-way monitors are capable of lower crossover points. I heard an unforced but natural and realistic soundstage with no borders.

Rather than cutting-and-pasting everything from the HEDD site, I'll post this one pic and recommend visiting this page for a fascinating and in-depth guide to the HEDD Air Motion Transformer and it's history.

The mid-range 4.7” (120mm) speaker basket and 1.25” (32mm) voice coil is punchy in that region. I mentioned the tickling sensation earlier and this felt like the top end of that – even at modest volume. Nice for 808's!

The woofer 7.2” (182mm) basket and 2” (51mm) voice coil does the deep sub thing especially with the Linearizer engaged. Beautifully-detailed low bass. Passed the Bob Katz-Rebecca Pidgeon test. Nice mono centre down deep.

The (silent) port is interestingly-shaped too; although it is a rounded rectangle or slot, it is also bevelled inside.

Again a lot of worthwhile info on the components and design specifics at the HEDD site.

Busy Bees:
In the Aston Shield reviews we saw how the honeycomb design – a hexagonal shape ubiquitous in outer space, nature and human tech/culture – offered advantages of strength, material and mechanical efficiency, lightness, in addition to the sonic advantage (in the case of a popshield) of distributing air pressure at an angle perpendicular to the force of direction.

HEDD have used the hexagon in their speaker material: they call the material/process 'UHC cone' (Ultra Honeycomb Composite). I couldn't find/fit in more info on this but maybe the subject of a future HEDD review.

Linearize It:
The Linearizer software (plug-in and stand-alone) is a great tool and adds detail and dynamics to the music heard. The Linearizer plug-in is either placed on the final output of a DAW (post-Limiter) or in a stand-alone mode for use with computer audio via VB cable.

It took me some time to figure out what exactly how to integrate the Linearizer into the production workflow? It made the monitor give more detail, sharper dynamics but that wouldn't translate to the mix as Linearizer should be bypassed for rendering. Perhaps the Linearizer was helping make mix and phase decisions? Improvement would stay on the track for rendering.

In fact the HEDD Linearizer plug-in uses Finite Impulse Response (FIR) to compare the expected physical response of the speakers with the digital audio passing through and then delays and adds filters to that digital audio so that when it is output; so the speaker is not 'fighting against itself' in terms of simultaneously receiving a signal to push-out or relax, positive or negative signal.

By phase aligning the signal (as the last software component in the chain) for the perfect (speaker) component/driver 'work,' the maximum efficiency is achieved.

The monitor performs optimally with the Linearizer engaged. Consequently there is less inefficiency and stress on the drivers and electronics potentially improving the lifetime of the components.

The sonic advantage is that better mix decisions (and a sharper, clearer listening experience) can be had based on the sonic improvement of the monitor efficiency.

HEDD say that many (99%) of current DSP-speakers have only basic IIR filtering and it can be shown that FIR is better suited to matching particular frequency response requirements e.g. monitors. The advantages of IIR, namely, efficiency, is less of an issue especially when run on a current device and HEDD seem to have nailed the software with no CPU hit on my old PC.

Klauss Heinz of HEDD explains it superbly in this short video: The HEDD Lineariser(R) - Heinz Electrodynamic Designs

The HEDD literature, manuals and website are good. Clear and informative and with the Linearizer you get information and charts for the: HEDD alignment curve (for the Type- ) or Anechoic flat curve; and then a selection of phase responses: linear. Part-linear, and minimum phase.

It's interesting and educational to spend some time with different audio sources and test the different settings; differences can be heard and for me it was possible to set it (Type-20 alignment Linear full range) and really feel that the monitors had disappeared as a source of the audio.
I think this is why I found this powerful 3-way system a good fit in the nearfield position.

Really hearing bass and sub:
Working in a small room brings issues of noise transmission to family, friends and neighbours (unless they like it of course); also small rooms by their nature are not suited to the deep bass trapping needed to soak up and tame the bass energy.
Passive and active resonators are another aid but these also require space and cash.
I noticed the name Sonarworks being used by many people – something of a reference product of the time.

I noticed how boomy the bass and sub was on familiar tracks – some known to be boomy, even by design, and others with too much sub. The HEDD Type-20's revealed this immediately.

On many previous tracks (especially non-electronic) I've just HPF'ed at 50Hz as I had no confidence below that – but the Type-20's go down to 30Hz and it was clear I could begin to have some confidence in what I was hearing.

For You?
Probably best to make a distinction between professional studio use (which I know little about) and semi-professional home studio: I can see the HEDD Type-20's appealing to both markets particularly as it's possible to add connectivity cards.

The common denominators are: superb, accurate, comfortable sound; a reliable reference for production; good value for money; professional features and connectivity; and ease-of-use.

The HEDD bridge inter-connectivity modules (one of which can be mounted into a rear panel slot) opens up DANTE/Audio-over-IP via CAT.6 Ethernet for HQ audio streaming and multi-channel set-ups (Dolby Atmos, Auro 3D, etc.) also distributed networks in multiple workspaces and listening venues.

Equally (without the optional digital module) you can enjoy analogue inputs in a simple way. The Linearizer, which works on the playback device, is still available for use and it can also be used stand-alone with VB cable software.

I see the HEDD Type-20's on consoles in nearfield positions and I think I understand why: even up close the naturalistic soundstage, resolution and dynamics are perfectly conveyed without fatigue.
The best value for me was in the ability to trust them: for making decisions; as a reliable reference. Best monitor I've tried to date.

Gearslutz Score.
Sound Quality 5/5 There's a difference between sounding good and allowing to hear music that sounds good. No problem identifying issues in an analytical sense but not punished by fatigue.
Basically it does what a full-range monitor needs to do without making you pay for it; that adds to its value.

Ease of Use 5/5 No problems listening all day without fatigue. Shelving and gain controls do a good job of tailoring the HEDD Type-20 to specific rooms/positions. The speaker arrangement means that the Type-20's are physically unobtrusive (for 3-ways) and they have a good 'longshot' depth. They deserve good stands. One point of general caution: when connecting monitors digitally there is the possibility of 0dBFS and these go loud! Usefully the rear panel gain dial can set an appropriate peak level.

Features 5/5 Never felt like I needed a sub. The HEDD 3-way system is flawless. The Linearizer software is a genuinely useful and effective sonic tool and I learnt more about audio from the process of using it; an ear educator. The digital amplifiers can produce quite high levels when needed and the sound was very linear at different listening levels (or as linear as one would expect given listening/SPL curves).

Bang-for-Buck 5/5 The HEDD Type-20 sits at a good bang/buck point relative to the 3-way competition. In a sense it's not just the first-class physical monitor you buy but also the decades of design expertise and the passion for audio excellence behind the Type-20's.

Credits and Links:
The Type 20 studio monitor by HEDD | Heinz Electrodynamic Designs
HEDD’s modular input card system HEDD Bridge
The HEDD Lineariser(R) - Heinz Electrodynamic Designs
Infinite impulse response - Wikipedia

Photos used courtesy of HEDD; additional photos by Arthur Stone.
Thanks to Steve Barton for the extended review period.

Attached Thumbnails
HEDD Type 20-hd20.png   HEDD Type 20-hdamt.png   HEDD Type 20-hdassembly.png   HEDD Type 20-hdbridge.png   HEDD Type 20-hdfoot.png  

HEDD Type 20-hdfront.png   HEDD Type 20-hdlin.png   HEDD Type 20-hdmag.png   HEDD Type 20-hdprep.png   HEDD Type 20-hdrear.png  

HEDD Type 20-hdtower.png   HEDD Type 20-hdtowerart.png  
  • 14
4th December 2017

HEDD Type 20 by sleeveheads

  • Sound Quality 5 out of 5
  • Ease of use 5 out of 5
  • Features 5 out of 5
  • Bang for buck 5 out of 5
  • Overall: 5
HEDD Type 20

If you are in the market for high-end nearfield monitors, I recommend you take the time to evaluate the HEDD Type 20s: I won’t list the 11 well-regarded speakers from 7 different brands that the HEDDs beat in my evaluation because speakers, rooms, ears and preferences are all different and I think that would be irresponsible of me to do that. However, I will say (with absolute conviction) that, for me, in my space, the HEDDs saw off serious competition from serious brands … and they did it with ease. Few of those monitors were less money – most were more (if not significantly more money). Some are Award-winning. Some are well-reviewed high-end speakers that have lots of advocates on these pages.

For context, my space is a 2.5m x 3.5m LEDE set-up with custom-made bass traps and absorption panels. The speakers are (less than ideally) positioned close to the boundary on the shortest wall. I listen <80cm from the monitors at a typical SPL of 85dB or below. My DAC is a Dangerous Source. Sonarworks provide some assistance to smooth out the room challenges that still prevail.

In terms of my evaluation method, competing pairs of monitors were decoupled from the desk and tweeters raised to equal height (ear level). I also created speaker-specific, level-matched Sonarworks profiles in my DAW to provide as much objectivity as possible when A/Bing reference material and my own mixes. I swapped the speaker positions and repeated the process to be as fair as possible and to assess what impact positioning might have over results in the room.

I do not make purchase decisions based on listening to pre-recorded music or reference tracks – I find that of limited value. Monitors are tools for mixing so what works for me is to do some actual mixing and mix some low track-count projects twice – once on one set of monitors, once on another. I reflect on the experience (how easy / engaging the process was) and then check the results on various playback systems.

My ‘wish list’ for my monitors was:

- Usable frequency response from 30Hz up
- Integrate well in an imperfect 2.5m x 3.5m room with a listening distance of <1m*
- Provide detail AND tell me what to do with it
- Natural and intuitive to level across the frequency range
- Supports mixing with vibe and feel (e.g. am I feeling the music/tapping my foot?)
- Resolve finer detail in EQ and compression
- Provide solid stereo and back-to-front imaging*at short distance
- Able to reveal timing issues*and transient detail
- Analytical but still musical
- Ultimately: Do I trust them?
- Ultimately: Do they translate? *

The Type 20s outperformed all the other monitors on test against these criteria: I trust them more than any other monitor I have used in the last 25 years of making music - What I hear is what I get. Some test mixes from other monitors translated just fine but the difference with the HEDDs was night and day: when I played back test HEDD mixes, they were truly exciting and the mix absolutely popped.

I also find the Type 20s musical and so I can both produce and mix music on them. The level of detail is immediately usable – which wasn’t the case with so many other monitors on test because, incredibly, some offered me little insight into what to do – despite the 'detail' on offer. (I found this most with internal DSP designs which I experienced as frustratingly veiled in spite of elements being audible). In contrast, the detail of the Type 20 (and Type 30) tell me immediately and instinctively what EQ, transient or saturation changes I’d like to dial in.

It was Andy Hong’s informative review of the Type 30s that prompted me to contact HEDD to try out both the 30s and 20s. I found HEDD to be really helpful and responsive. (The 30s are an identical experience – just with even more SPL). I’ve tried to avoid superlatives in this review but I have to say I was blown away with the Type 20s and had zero anxiety replacing my (much more expensive) nearfields with them. I hope you feel the same connection with whichever speakers win your own evaluation.

Last edited by sleeveheads; 9th December 2017 at 10:42 PM..

  • 13
16th March 2021

HEDD Type 20 by shoey9998

  • Sound Quality 5 out of 5
  • Ease of use 5 out of 5
  • Features 5 out of 5
  • Bang for buck 5 out of 5
  • Overall: 5
HEDD Type 20

The cheapest monitors I would call "mastering grade.' An unbelievably well-rounded and priced set of monitors that adapt to different rooms like nothing I've ever used. Hedd Linearizer, while not amazingly useful on first use, becomes necessary for testing phase coherence.

Highly recommend, they're a lot cheaper if you buy from Thomann and wait the three weeks in shipping.


Similar Threads

Thread / Review Starter Comments / Views Last Post
replies: 151 views: 56803
Avatar for mungu
mungu 10th July 2020
replies: 117 views: 36474
Avatar for JblKid95
JblKid95 4 weeks ago
replies: 716 views: 17587
Avatar for Shannon Adkins
Shannon Adkins 2 hours ago