Quote:
Originally Posted by
studer58
➡️
Today's gear often just has more menus to wade through, more potential to get into trouble or mis-patch with, if the user's experience and knowledge doesn't equate with the equipment's potential. Older gear, used with intelligence and within its limits and operating parameters wasn't the limiting factor in recording or PA gear delivering good satisfying sound, given the standards of the day. Every generation thinks its best gear is 'state of the art'....maybe it is (for the era it's created within) ?
i fully disagree in the case of live sound gear (and i doubt you're in the position to correctly assess live sound gear and techniques)...
old live sound gear was terrible! it was far from full-range, was lo-fi, had low spl, terrible coverage, was heavy, inefficient, distorted very easily, was prone to issues, techniques were not fully understood or inexistent, etc. so the
gear was very much a limiting factor:
think of the beatles' disastrous live sound experience but also then also of the amazing development of very capable new tools and techniques (neodym magnets, line arrays, steering capability of subwoofer arrays, switching amps, dsp, fft measurements etc.).
check out bob mccarthy's series of articles on the development (and alignment) of pa systems over the last 40 years on prosoundweb...
___
ironically, i have to correct my previous quote about the importance of gear - in the case of live sound: it's very much about the gear! ;-)
or maybe not: live sound gear has become so good that there is no more excuse for bad live sound/you cannot blame the gear anymore...