The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
Tom Fine AES Mercury Location recording practices
Old 10th April 2021
  #1
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
Tom Fine AES Mercury Location recording practices

Some here might find this video engaging, it's Tom Fine giving an AES presentation in Nov 2020 on his parent's recording methods and equipment used on location for Mercury in the 50's and 60's:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Dp8qLbS51YE
Old 10th April 2021
  #2
Lives for gear
 
jnorman's Avatar
 
3 Reviews written
🎧 15 years
Fun! Thanks Studer.
Old 3 weeks ago
  #3
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
If you'd like to see a short video slice of microphone history: the original Fine/Mercury trio of Schoeps/Telefunken M201's ...here certainly is it:

https://youtu.be/KhovppBBCu0
Attached Thumbnails
Tom Fine AES Mercury Location recording practices-box-set.jpg  

Last edited by studer58; 3 weeks ago at 06:31 AM..
Old 3 weeks ago
  #4
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
....added a few additional background links for those interested in the Mercury ethos and approach, plus some CD sleeve notes encompassing Mercury's recordings of the Eastman Wind Ensemble, with Frederick Fennell...as well as a photo of the 3 mic LCR approach in action with Fennell conducting (note the use of what appears to be ropes and pulleys, rather than mic stands, to adjust miking height)

https://www.speakerscornerrecords.co...ce-the-history

https://www.theabsolutesound.com/art...iving-presence

https://www.stereophile.com/content/...s-again-may-14

http://www.soundfountain.com/mercury...-monodays.html

http://www.soundfountain.com/amb/mercury.html

Bob Fine's recording Truck :1951-66 ....http://www.preservationsound.com/201...uck-1951-1966/

Westrex 35mm film audio recording: http://www.arsc-audio.org/conference...ine_slides.pdf

https://www.stereophile.com/content/...nce-recordings

https://www.dso.org/watch-listen-and...iving-presence
Attached Thumbnails
Tom Fine AES Mercury Location recording practices-eastman-mercury-recording-method-1.jpg   Tom Fine AES Mercury Location recording practices-fennell-eastman-wind-ensemble-mercury-recording-lcr.jpg   Tom Fine AES Mercury Location recording practices-mercury-3-mics-pulleys.jpg   Tom Fine AES Mercury Location recording practices-recording-notes-eastman-wind-ensemble-1.jpg  
Old 3 weeks ago
  #5
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
Tom Fine, recalling the significant contribution of his parents to the art of recording from the 50's: source https://www.stereophile.com/content/...nce-recordings

"In the very early days [of Living Presence] it was a single Telefunken U-47 microphone that went directly to a Fairchild full-track tape recorder. But by 1953 my father had discovered the omnidirectional Schoeps M201 microphone, and he switched to using that as the single mike." (The Schoeps M201, first marketed in 1952, was 140mm long and 23mm in diameter.) "It was ideal for that use because it's a very sensitive microphone, and the way the presence peak in that microphone happens to work, it was perfect for backing it off to where he liked to put it and still getting the strings.

"The whole thing you are doing with this technique is you're basically using the presence peak on these European condenser microphones to make up for the fact that the treble frequencies decay faster than other frequencies in a venue, in a real space. And that's how you get the width and the depth but still the detail. To put it into visual terms, it's like you have a great depth of field to your lens."

The problem was that the Schoeps mikes were virtually handmade, and after a certain point, Dr. Karl Schoeps and his first employee, Dr. Wilhelm Kusters, wouldn't make any more in their small workshop in Karlsruhe, Germany. Bob Fine spent the next six years hunting down more M201s, of which it is rumored as few as 36 were made. Mercury required that the Living Presence team have six M201s—three and three backups—before they could go out on the road to record an orchestra. "At first, in recording for stereo, they tried two Telefunken U-47s on the sides [and an M201 in the center], but they only used that briefly," says Tom Fine. "They eventually settled on the Neumann KM-56s on the sides. And so pretty much everything made from 1956 to '59 has the two KM-56s on the sides and an M201 in the middle. And then, by 1959, they had three '201s with backups, so that's what they used the rest of the time."

From the microphones suspended above the orchestra—the height varied with the project, but averaged 12' above the conductor's head—the stereo signal would go to PULTEC MB1 preamps in the famous Living Presence truck, a Chevy panel van stuffed full of tapes and equipment. The left and right mikes would feed the top and bottom tracks of two three-track tape recorders. The center channel would feed the center track on the two stereo machines that were recording, plus the full-track (mono) machine. The tapes would be edited in three-track, so two tapes were made, an A and a B reel.

"Remember that mono LPs outsold stereo LPs until the mid-'60s, so you had to make sure you had a good mono master," Fine says. "I am often asked, why wouldn't you just make the mono master off the center track of the three-track tape? Too much crosstalk. You could do it off film, but you can't do it off three-track tape. You have to run a separate full-track tape.

"They used audio tape from Audio Devices. It was standard 1960s non–back-coated brown oxide tape. Strangely enough, both of my parents liked the quality of the hiss on Audio Devices tape better than [the hiss on] Scotch [tape]. That's why they used it."

The three-track tapes were recorded on Ampex 300-3 half-inch machines at 15ips. In addition to recording tape, some Living Presence sessions were recorded on 35mm magnetic film; these can be identified by what looks like a strip of film, with sprocket holes, running across the top of the album covers.

"Dad thought the film stuff sounded markedly better," Fine remembers. "It's lower noise, lower print-through, it's wider tracks, and a slightly faster speed so, theoretically, a slightly better dynamic range—and definitely a lower noise floor. My mother's opinion when she was making the CDs was that the film masters sound really good, but it's okay when I have to use a tape master."

The 3- to 2-channel mixdowns of sessions recorded on standard tape were done on a modified Westrex mixer. Wilma Fine mixed from first-generation session tapes, which would become the master from which the LPs were pressed; it's that detail that gives Living Presence releases such an alive sound. For the original LPs, the mixer directly fed the custom cutting chain at Fine Recording, in the Great Northern Hotel in Manhattan (the site of today's Parker Meridian Hotel). There, a Westrex cutter head on a Scully lathe was fed by modified McIntosh 200W tube amplifiers. The mono records were cut with a Miller cutter head.

"Back in the LP day, my mother would mix the 3/2 as the LP was being cut. I always describe her role as a human preview head, because she would sit there with a score, and she and mastering engineer George Piros had hand signals as to when to tighten and widen the margin. She'd be reading a few measures ahead, and give him a hand signal when a loud part was coming up or when a soft part was coming up. That's how he could cut 30-minute sides when he had to."

While Bob Fine was an independent contractor, Wilma was a Mercury Records employee: VP in charge of classical records, and producer of the Living Presence releases. Before landing the Mercury gig, she'd interviewed for a producer's job at RCA Records, whose Living Stereo series later became Living Presence's major competitor. According to Tom Fine, RCA had told her, "Women don't run sessions. Women don't edit tapes. Women don't make marketing decisions here." In 2011, Wilma Cozart Fine posthumously won a Trustees Grammy Award.

"The new LPs were cut from the digital masters made by my mother in the 1990s. This was done because no one from the Mercury team is alive to make a 3/2 mix from the master tapes. The 3/2 mix is much more important to the Mercury sound qualities than the medium of the release product."

Unbelievably—or maybe not, considering the often pathetic archival history of the music business—a few of the later CD reissues of Living Presence titles were made from the B reels because the edited masters had been lost, or the splices on the A reels were so bad as to be irreparable. All of the Living Presence tapes were catalogued in the mid-1990s, and since then have been stored together in a climate-controlled vault at the Berliner Studios, in Germany. Yet a number of tapes were lost after the initial LP pressings.

In 1989, Philips, then owned by PolyGram, asked Wilma Fine if she'd be interested in helming a full-blown reissue program of Mercury Living Presence CDs. "My mother said, 'Sure,' but she'd have to make sure that she did this digital thing right, because she was unimpressed with the early digital stuff."

Wilma Fine ended up taking almost a year to do it, working with engineer Dennis Drake at PolyGram studios in Edison, New Jersey, to decide what would work as a transfer chain. "The dCS analog-to-digital converter came out then, which I think internally used bitstream technology," Tom Fine says, "but it basically output 24-bit/44.1kHz digital. And then they would put that into a Harmonia Mundi Acoustica digital console that had a dither-down module that would take it down to 16 bits after it had been transferred, and put that into a standard AES/EBU signal that went to the Sony PCM-1630 mastering machine. I think she'd run two '1630s at once; that's why she had a digital bus. She never liked the Sonic Solutions system. She was still making '1630 masters up to the end.

"The center was always paramount with the Living Presence thing. The mono versions of the LPs were always made from that single center mike, and the sides would be matched to the center. You'd bring the sides up to add width and depth and height to the soundfield. I was in the studio a few times, and you'd look at the faders, and they were within a half dB of each other anyway—that's just the way the mikes were set up. Basically, what you're getting is what was on the tape. And that's what came from the microphones. The whole secret to the technique is having the ears to focus and set the microphones correctly. Other than that, there's really very little electronic trickery or manipulation involved."

Given the glorious sound that still emanates from these new CD and LP reissues—the ringing cavalry bugle calls in the first volume of The Civil War (Mercury 432 592-2) or János Starker's sensitive readings of J.S. Bach's Cello Suites (Mercury 432 757-2), to name just two examples—what will always remain most impressive and magical about the Living Presence catalog are the Fines' ears for repertoire and performances. Wilma, in particular, is perhaps best known for coaxing classic performances out of often temperamental artists.

"It was a realism," the Fines' rightfully proud son says today of his parents' sonic aims. "They wanted an honesty: the honest sound of the instruments, how they really sounded. They wanted a clarity to everything. They weren't as interested in sounding like you were in the tenth row as they were in hearing inside the music."
Old 3 weeks ago
  #6
Lives for gear
 
king2070lplaya's Avatar
I have most of the Paray/DSO recordings, and really enjoy the later entries, like the Symphonie Fantastique. They are a great example IMO of what Fine could accomplish with just 3 mics, and sonically they stand about toe to toe with contemporary recordings on other labels.

Perhaps not surprisingly, another small catalog of recordings I am incredibly fond of is the series of Dorati/DSO recordings on Decca from the late 70s/Mid 80s, specifically the Stravinsky ballets and the Grofe Grand Canyon Suite (though the entire catalog is quite good). The haunting acoustic of the now-demolished Cass Technical HS’s auditorium from the later Mercury disks is replaced with the similarly haunting acoustic of Detroit’s even-at-that-time decrepit United Artists Theater, to great effect.

Being from Cleveland, I’m not always comfortable with my affinity for the city across the lake, in the state that Ohioans are born to loathe, but having grown up on excessive amounts of Motown I suppose it’s not entirely surprising! Probably a lot of common symphony players between all 3 of those groups of recordings
Old 3 weeks ago
  #7
Gear Addict
 
🎧 10 years
Please notice the nice plug for DSD beginning about 45:00

It's only gotten much better with the advent of DSD256.

Great find Studer, thanks!
📝 Reply

Similar Threads

Thread / Thread Starter Replies / Views Last Post
replies: 5775 views: 1860290
Avatar for crestifer
crestifer 1 week ago
replies: 63 views: 5551
Avatar for snüzz
snüzz 3rd February 2011
replies: 716 views: 17624
Avatar for Shannon Adkins
Shannon Adkins 6 hours ago
Topic:
Post Reply

Welcome to the Gearspace Pro Audio Community!

Registration benefits include:
  • The ability to reply to and create new discussions
  • Access to members-only giveaways & competitions
  • Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As
  • Access to members-only sub forum discussions
  • Access to members-only Chat Room
  • Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio Classifieds for only USD $20/year
  • Promote your eBay auctions and Reverb.com listings for free
  • Remove this message!
You need an account to post a reply. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered.


 
 
Slide to join now Processing…

Forum Jump
Forum Jump