Quantcast
Guitar delays: to print or not - Gearspace.com
The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
Guitar delays: to print or not
Old 30th September 2005
  #1
Gear Nut
 
🎧 15 years
Guitar delays: to print or not

Michael,

Let me echo the many thanks voiced here one more time -- reading your posts has been an absolute delight.

In a perfect world (your perfect world anyway) if a guitarist uses lots of Space Echo, Boss DM-2, etc do you mind if those effects are printed on the guitar tracks, or would you rather have the flexibility to add them yourself? Or one more option, is it better when recording to route the delay's output to a second amp and record one track main amp dry, one delay only?
Old 30th September 2005
  #2
Past Guest Moderator
 
Michael Brauer's Avatar
 
🎧 15 years
If that's the guitar sound you like, print it! I'm just a mixer. Print everything that you've been living with in the course of making a record. Efx's , delays, reverbs, they all are part of the sound you've created. Don't make me try and recreate it. Yes, having the option of a dry and wet sound is good. My thoughts on this have changed over the years. I used to say,give me a dry guitar sound, now i say, give me your sound.

Similar Threads

Thread / Thread Starter Replies / Views Last Post
replies: 61 views: 8201
Avatar for morecoffeeplease
morecoffeeplease 29th September 2013
replies: 95 views: 13578
Avatar for everythinglouder
everythinglouder 18th January 2020

Forum Jump
Forum Jump