Quantcast
SPL Vitalizer MK2-t plugin!! - Page 11 - Gearspace.com
The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
SPL Vitalizer MK2-t plugin!!
Old 18th January 2010 | Show parent
  #301
Gear Head
 
🎧 10 years
Does anybody know how the stereo widener on the Vitalizer compares to other stereo wideners like Waves, etc.? What's the difference if any?

I read somewhere that legendary dance music artist Chicane used a Vitalizer on his first 2 albums, especially this stereo width function for putting his pads to the side. I'm interested in using it for the same, but I'm wondering if there's a better option...
Old 18th January 2010 | Show parent
  #302
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnguyen437 ➡️
Does anybody know how the stereo widener on the Vitalizer compares to other stereo wideners like Waves, etc.? What's the difference if any?

I read somewhere that legendary dance music artist Chicane used a Vitalizer on his first 2 albums, especially this stereo width function for putting his pads to the side. I'm interested in using it for the same, but I'm wondering if there's a better option...
Well, like with all the stereo "expanders", use it with care, SUBTLE.

That plugins can do wonders on full mixes, but if you plan to use it just for that, maybe you may give a look to cheaper plugins.
Old 18th January 2010 | Show parent
  #303
Lives for gear
 
Suda Badri's Avatar
 
🎧 10 years
Well Flux do a free stereo plug-in, expands like you would imagine any expander would... the Vitalizer hardware uses tubes in the widening circuit so that might be why chicane used it exclusively... but someone here posted the stereo widening does not emulate the tube stage yumminess.... but yeah dont buy the vitalizer only for the stereo widening, unless you rich! Flux stereo tool is a god sent for anyone on cubase pissed off about stereo tracks and their one slider panning...

Cheers,

Suda
Old 18th January 2010 | Show parent
  #304
Lives for gear
 
T_R_S's Avatar
 
1 Review written
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnguyen437 ➡️
Does anybody know how the stereo widener on the Vitalizer compares to other stereo wideners like Waves, etc.? What's the difference if any?

I read somewhere that legendary dance music artist Chicane used a Vitalizer on his first 2 albums, especially this stereo width function for putting his pads to the side. I'm interested in using it for the same, but I'm wondering if there's a better option...
Duy Wide and BX Hybrid Digital EQ has a wide function. But I like the SPL myself as it does not mess the phase up as much as DUY.
Old 18th January 2010 | Show parent
  #305
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
Nice plugin, great on bringing that collophonium out in strings, but going digital SPL missed the chance to implement the most important feature and advantage of digital:

auto gain compensation at the output for meaningful AB comparisons.
That feature alone makes Ozone or other plugs with that feature so valuable.

How often bypass would have been the best setting, yet the louder signal wins...

If SPL could get this implemented, I might buy it.
Old 18th January 2010 | Show parent
  #306
Lives for gear
 
WunderBro Flo's Avatar
 
2 Reviews written
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by audio ergo sum ➡️
Nice plugin, great on bringing that collophonium out in strings, but going digital SPL missed the chance to implement the most important feature and advantage of digital:

auto gain compensation at the output for meaningful AB comparisons.
That feature alone makes Ozone or other plugs with that feature so valuable.

How often bypass would have been the best setting, yet the louder signal wins...

If SPL could get this implemented, I might buy it.
You must dial in the right output level manually, an accurate automatic gain compensation does not exist. It never really worked well with dynamic devices, but is impossible for EQs....
Best,
Pat
Old 18th January 2010 | Show parent
  #307
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildCowboys ➡️
You must dial in the right output level manually, an accurate automatic gain compensation does not exist. It never really worked well with dynamic devices, but is impossible for EQs....
Best,
Pat
Why impossible for EQs?
Because of Fletcher-Munson?
There are approximations for compensation that work well enough in EQs.
How does Ozone do it?
Old 18th January 2010 | Show parent
  #308
Lives for gear
 
WunderBro Flo's Avatar
 
2 Reviews written
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by audio ergo sum ➡️
Why impossible for EQs?
Because of Fletcher-Munson?
There are approximations for compensation that work well enough in EQs.
How does Ozone do it?
It cannot work because a bassy source with lots of amplitude around 65Hz will get lower in volume when the process is turned up (just process no bass process going on) with a f setting of 2k for example - whereas a sound that has mostly upper midrange will get louder at the exact same setting. The source material determines if and how much the level changes and in which direction. Or with a standard eq, think of a hiphop sine bass without overtones - set an EQ to a 12dB boost at 5kHz, the level of the bass will not change at all - an automatic loudness compensation would pull the level down some hefty dBs nonetheless etc. etc.....An average automatic loudness compensation could only be done when exclusively working on signals that contains all frequencies like pink noise, it might get ok results when dealing with full mixes that contain many frequencies as well. In that case it could be pretty accurate, but then again, listen on a non fullrange speaker and it will be off again. Use it on single sources and get very wrong results. I would rather have no automatic compensation and do it precisely by hand than having an automated process that tries but can´t succeed. In those cases the user thinks the loudnesses are automatically compensated for when they are not in reality, so the user makes a decision on something wrong again, thinking he´s safe.

Rock on!
Pat
Old 18th January 2010 | Show parent
  #309
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
I see your point but considering that in particular Vitalizer works only with very wide EQ bands with shallow Q settings, it should not be too difficult to find a good approximation for loudness compensation.

It is just so much easier to judge the overall timbre, when the loudness remains constant following immediately and continuously every timbre change.
Old 18th January 2010 | Show parent
  #310
Lives for gear
 
WunderBro Flo's Avatar
 
2 Reviews written
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by audio ergo sum ➡️
It is just so much easier to judge the overall timbre, when the loudness remains constant following immediately and continuously every timbre change.
You are totally right with this thought, but the problem is that it´s simply not possible. The source determines the resulting loudness change combined with any eq setting. The same EQ setting on a bass track will result in a very different level change on a hh track - so there cannot be an automatic gain compensation for the EQ setting. Impossible...

Rock on!
Pat
Old 21st January 2010 | Show parent
  #311
Lives for gear
 
🎧 15 years
DUlls the sound

When I insert the plugin into the audio path, it dulls the sound.
I haven't read all the posts to notice if some else has mentioned this.

The manual states:

Default Settings
The following are the default settings of the plug-in and they have
no impact on the audio signal:
• DRIVE at “0” (center position)
• BASS at “0” (center position)
• COMPRESSION at OFF (hard left)
• MID-HI TUNE at 3 kHz (center position)
• PROCESS at OFF (hard left)
• LC-EQ at LOW (hard left)
• INTENSITY at OFF (hard left)
• STEREO EXPANDER at OFF (hard left)
• OUTPUT at “0” (center position)

To repeat

"no impact on the audio signal"

I have found the opposite to be true.
Inserting this plugin removes the openness, solid lows, the detailed highes, the snap, punch and clarity of the original sound. No matter what I tried, I could not bring back the quality of the original and work from there. I found myself trying first to compensate for the damage this plugin does to my tracks, let alone trying to "improve" or make acceptable adjustments.

It was easy to make the sound brighter and louder and thinner. Perhaps this plugin is only for adjusting very, very poor audio sources where there is nothing good in the original.

Also, there is no function to copy your settings from one memory button to another. If you wish to compare settings, you have to manually recreated them in another memory button, and then make the adjustments. This is so basic, how could a programmer not think it important? And another plugin design that does not allow you to save settings to disk so you may recall them in another application or back them up for security.

Very disappointing.

I own SPL hardware which I quite like.

I tried the plugin in Nuendo 4 and Samplitude 10.

my 2 cents
Old 21st January 2010 | Show parent
  #312
Lives for gear
 
WunderBro Flo's Avatar
 
2 Reviews written
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by rob99 ➡️
Inserting this plugin removes the openness, solid lows, the detailed highes, the snap, punch and clarity of the original sound. No matter what I tried, I could not bring back the quality of the original and work from there. I found myself trying first to compensate for the damage this plugin does to my tracks, let alone trying to "improve" or make acceptable adjustments.
My guess on this is that you are probably "hearing" things. Like back then when you were convinced (and probably still are) that the powercore Oxford EQ sounds brighter than the native version...which I found to null at minus infinity in a 180° cancellation scenario...

In the case of the Vitalizer there is no nulling though, so the "neutral" setting changes the sound (as to be expected with an algorithm trying to simulate a complex analog signal path), so the degradation statement will be a matter of personal preferences. As it seems most users, including bigshots like Greg Wells and the professionals he works with, seem to love what the plugin can do to improve their sound. Personally I think the same, the thing can do really, really good stuff given it is used with moderation in the right spots. Degradation of bass, highs, punch, clarity in it´s most neutral setting? Not what I´m hearing at all, but that´s just me.

Best,
Pat
Old 21st January 2010 | Show parent
  #313
Lives for gear
 
Suda Badri's Avatar
 
🎧 10 years
It does not degrade the signal, but the hardware is so much more forgiving... this plug-in made me realize the noobness of my ears...
Old 21st January 2010 | Show parent
  #314
Gear Guru
 
matt thomas's Avatar
 
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by rob99 ➡️
The manual states:

Default Settings

The following are the default settings of the plug-in and they have
no impact on the audio signal:

To repeat

"no impact on the audio signal"

I have found the opposite to be true.
Inserting this plugin removes the openness, solid lows, the detailed highes, the snap, punch and clarity of the original sound.
I read this and realised it was very easy to test your calim. I did a null test between a dry track and the same track with the vitaliser (default settings) and it nulled 100% (clarification: at least as far as the meters go in logic, and also to my ears)

In other words SPL are correct, their is literally "no impact on the audio signal" with the default settings. Anything you are hearing is either user error or in your head.

EDIT: on closer inspection it is not a total null, see the next few posts! apologies to rob99

matt
Old 21st January 2010 | Show parent
  #315
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt thomas ➡️
I read this and realised it was very easy to test your calim. I did a null test between a dry track and the same track with the vitaliser (default settings) and it nulled 100%

In other words SPL are correct, their is literally "no impact on the audio signal" with the default settings. Anything you are hearing is either user error or in your head.

matt
Shame on them, they didn't model the analog bypass switch correctly? What about corrosion, is that at least modeled?
I also see no place for entering the desired room temperature in the settings, really disappointing. What about cosmic radiation?
I can hear that none of these are accurately modeled.
Old 21st January 2010 | Show parent
  #316
Lives for gear
 
WunderBro Flo's Avatar
 
2 Reviews written
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt thomas ➡️
I read this and realised it was very easy to test your calim. I did a null test between a dry track and the same track with the vitaliser (default settings) and it nulled 100%

In other words SPL are correct, their is literally "no impact on the audio signal" with the default settings. Anything you are hearing is either user error or in your head.

matt
Really? When I do this in cubase5 with delay compensation, it does not null. What sampling rate did you use? Maybe it is an upsampling thing...
Best,
Pat
Old 21st January 2010 | Show parent
  #317
Gear Guru
 
matt thomas's Avatar
 
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildCowboys ➡️
Really? When I do this in cubase5 with delay compensation, it does not null. What sampling rate did you use? Maybe it is an upsampling thing...
Best,
Pat
Well thats strange, are you sure you didn't miss something? Maybe the VST behaves differently from the AU? Maybe the delat is not reported correctly? that wouldn't be right..

I used 44.1 (from memory)

I added a clarification to my post above. By "nulled 100%" I mean as far as the meters measure in logic. Nothing was
registering on the meters when the tracks were nulled, and I couldn't hear anything in my headphones. I didn't check it further.

EDIT: on closer inspection it is not a total null, see the next few posts! apologies to rob99

matt
Old 21st January 2010 | Show parent
  #318
Gear Maniac
 
🎧 10 years
i pulled the trigger and ordered the spl vitalizer plugin from mercenary audio......

installed it today. im loving it..hehheh

tried the demo and decided what the hell go for it..
Old 21st January 2010 | Show parent
  #319
Lives for gear
 
WunderBro Flo's Avatar
 
2 Reviews written
🎧 15 years
I only got it to null when deactivating the Active button...when it was on with the default settings I got no null...is your Active button on when you get the null?
Best,
Pat
Old 21st January 2010 | Show parent
  #320
Gear Guru
 
matt thomas's Avatar
 
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildCowboys ➡️
I only got it to null when deactivating the Active button...when it was on with the default settings I got no null...is your Active button on when you get the null?
Best,
Pat
It nulled, untill I twiddled some knobs, so it can't have been in bypass

Hang on, I'm just trying it again and now its not nulling, perhaps it was user error on my part, but I'm sure I had it right before, weird, I'll keep trying and post an update soon

edit: OK, its not nulling, there is a small amount of level showing on my sonalksis meter, but I can't hear it on headphones in the noisy environment I'm currently in. I think perhaps the track I was originally trying it on was too lower level, so the almost null appeared to be a full null.

I'm still trying some more

edit 2: yeah it is not a 100% null, sorry for claiming otherwise, I'll make sure to be more thorough in future! my apologies to Rob 99

matt
Old 30th January 2010 | Show parent
  #321
Lives for gear
 
lematrix's Avatar
 
🎧 10 years
Vitalizer is a bomb on BV Vocals.
Mixed this week an album where the BV´s where poor and dull recorded.
Vitalizer put life in to it.

GREAT !!!!!
Old 31st January 2010 | Show parent
  #322
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
What other plugins can emulate passive LC filter designs?
I know Algorithmix Blue can do it.
Anything else?
Anyone done some comparisons?
Old 31st January 2010 | Show parent
  #323
Gear Guru
 
Animus's Avatar
 
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suda Badri ➡️
Well Flux do a free stereo plug-in, expands like you would imagine any expander would... the Vitalizer hardware uses tubes in the widening circuit so that might be why chicane used it exclusively... but someone here posted the stereo widening does not emulate the tube stage yumminess.... but yeah dont buy the vitalizer only for the stereo widening, unless you rich! Flux stereo tool is a god sent for anyone on cubase pissed off about stereo tracks and their one slider panning...

Cheers,

Suda

You can change the pan behavior in Cubendo to have more than one pan slider.
Old 31st January 2010 | Show parent
  #324
Gear Guru
 
Animus's Avatar
 
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jantex ➡️
And there are many people like me who agree with this statement
Yeah If you want to use up half of a i7 920.
Old 1st February 2010 | Show parent
  #325
Lives for gear
 
Suda Badri's Avatar
 
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by Animus ➡️
You can change the pan behavior in Cubendo to have more than one pan slider.
TELL ME PLEASE! dont tell me I have to right click... dam mac i never thought of it...
Old 1st February 2010 | Show parent
  #326
Gear Guru
 
Animus's Avatar
 
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suda Badri ➡️
TELL ME PLEASE! dont tell me I have to right click... dam mac i never thought of it...
Yeah, right click on the panner area and you can choose from 3 types.
Old 31st January 2011 | Show parent
  #327
Gear Nut
 
amusic's Avatar
 
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by lematrix ➡️
Vitalizer is a bomb on BV Vocals.
Mixed this week an album where the BV´s where poor and dull recorded.
Vitalizer put life in to it.

GREAT !!!!!
such in use?
Old 20th October 2011 | Show parent
  #328
Gear Head
 
🎧 10 years
Guys!

Just noticed that the Stereo Expander on this thing almost leaves the phase INTACT!!

Try Listening in Mono while messing around with it... Nothing happens!!

While the Flux or Waves Stereo Imager spoil the mono.

Anyone noticed that too?

Old 20th October 2011 | Show parent
  #329
Lives for gear
 
javahut's Avatar
 
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crashdown ➡️
Guys!

Just noticed that the Stereo Expander on this thing almost leaves the phase INTACT!!

Try Listening in Mono while messing around with it... Nothing happens!!

While the Flux or Waves Stereo Imager spoil the mono.

Anyone noticed that too?

Wow! Thanks for that. Never thought about it really, but good to know. It's still one of the few plug-ins I'll use on the 2 buss when I get towards the end of a mix. I really like what it does to the low end and stereo separation/enhancement when used judiciously... especially for eletronic type music that's meant to surround you and have big sub low end.
Old 30th September 2012 | Show parent
  #330
Gear Nut
 
Retrospekta's Avatar
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by spl_support ➡️
The Vitalizer plug-in does EXACTLY what the original MK2t hardware does, including the mid notches (that´s part of the wanted sound).
Dirk.
i fail to see the benefit of this, its rather a deal breaker... imho...

PD: i am seeing this thread because i found a mk2t second hand and was interested in finding out about it.. but why would you want to have something in your signal chain that is not actually only doing what it should do?
📝 Reply

Similar Threads

Thread / Thread Starter Replies / Views Last Post
replies: 50 views: 54044
Avatar for Andy Hamm
Andy Hamm 21st February 2011
replies: 4616 views: 612134
Avatar for smoke
smoke 7th May 2021
replies: 10 views: 16675
Avatar for 2nd order
2nd order 14th July 2008
replies: 98 views: 37559
Avatar for dfghdhr
dfghdhr 1 week ago
Post Reply

Welcome to the Gearspace Pro Audio Community!

Registration benefits include:
  • The ability to reply to and create new discussions
  • Access to members-only giveaways & competitions
  • Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As
  • Access to members-only sub forum discussions
  • Access to members-only Chat Room
  • Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio Classifieds for only USD $20/year
  • Promote your eBay auctions and Reverb.com listings for free
  • Remove this message!
You need an account to post a reply. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered.


 
 
Slide to join now Processing…

Forum Jump
Forum Jump