Quantcast
Apple Music announces Spatial Audio with Dolby Atmos; will bring Lossless Audio to entire catalog - Page 9 - Gearspace.com
The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
Apple Music announces Spatial Audio with Dolby Atmos; will bring Lossless Audio to entire catalog
Old 1 week ago
  #241
Gear Maniac
 
John Mayer's newest album is my fav Atmos album so far.

Listening to the Atmos version on both Atmos 7.2.2 speaker system and using non-Apple headphones.

Who did the Atmos mix for that?
Old 1 week ago | Show parent
  #242
Lives for gear
 
jeremy.c.'s Avatar
The Rufus Du Sol Live from Joshua Tree is pretty rad in Atmos. I don't have a setup, only on headphones.

Not just biased because I live there...
Old 1 week ago | Show parent
  #243
Gear Nut
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by louderjamz ➡️
John Mayer's newest album is my fav Atmos album so far.

Listening to the Atmos version on both Atmos 7.2.2 speaker system and using non-Apple headphones.

Who did the Atmos mix for that?
I’m pretty sure it’s Spike Stent since he mixed the whole record. Haven’t listened to the atmos mix since I disabled it on my Apple Music (most of the stuff I looked for sounded awful compared to the stereo lossless mix) but the record sounds amazing so I bet it is a great experience if the amos mix was well executed.
Old 1 week ago | Show parent
  #244
Gear Maniac
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rixscix ➡️
if the amos mix was well executed.
It is to my ears / personal tastes.

Most of the music is coming from the front, with just a sprinkling of spatial effects in the surround speakers (in my setup anyway). That's the way it should be in my opinion. Really good use of L, C and R channels. Especially Center channel.

I don't want to hear John Mayer playing guitar behind me
Old 5 days ago | Show parent
  #245
Gear Nut
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by louderjamz ➡️
It is to my ears / personal tastes.

Most of the music is coming from the front, with just a sprinkling of spatial effects in the surround speakers (in my setup anyway). That's the way it should be in my opinion. Really good use of L, C and R channels. Especially Center channel.

I don't want to hear John Mayer playing guitar behind me
I’ve heard it. It’s a really really good atmos mix.
Old 4 days ago | Show parent
  #246
Gear Maniac
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by rixscix ➡️
I’ve heard it. It’s a really really good atmos mix.
But don't some people wanna hear Greg Phillinganes playing keyboard from the ceiling !

Like some other Atmos mixes I've heard.

Old 3 days ago
  #247
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
The real benefit of Atmos mixes is the improvements to dynamics.

Old 2 days ago | Show parent
  #248
Lives for gear
 
TheHanes's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by miscend ➡️
The real benefit of Atmos mixes is the improvements to dynamics.

So I mixed the Coldplay example in Atmos, along with the rest of the Coldplay album to be released.

Very nice review and analysis.

Dynamics is actually one of the things that is hardest to get right in Atmos in my opinion. We have so much more room to play with, but need to maintain as much of the original mix sound as possible. The original mix would have been through mastering, I don't believe that my Atmos version was mastered.

I did the Atmos mix on my own, no input, no one from production or band during the mix.

The client did audition and approve the Atmos mix, though exactly who in that chain it was I'm not certain. I know that one of the engineer / producers on the project did audition most / many of the album Atmos mixes that I did and approved. Not sure if the band, song producers heard them. It is pretty hard to find a proper room for them to get into to listen to the mixes with their own obligations and schedules.
Old 2 days ago | Show parent
  #249
Here for the gear
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHanes ➡️
So I mixed the Coldplay example in Atmos, along with the rest of the Coldplay album to be released.

Very nice review and analysis.

Dynamics is actually one of the things that is hardest to get right in Atmos in my opinion. We have so much more room to play with, but need to maintain as much of the original mix sound as possible. The original mix would have been through mastering, I don't believe that my Atmos version was mastered.

I did the Atmos mix on my own, no input, no one from production or band during the mix.

The client did audition and approve the Atmos mix, though exactly who in that chain it was I'm not certain. I know that one of the engineer / producers on the project did audition most / many of the album Atmos mixes that I did and approved. Not sure if the band, song producers heard them. It is pretty hard to find a proper room for them to get into to listen to the mixes with their own obligations and schedules.
Thanks John - This is a very good review - agreed - and confirms that the good Atmos mixes to me do sound better than a stereo - BUT - there are so many bad Atmos mixes out there - many people might turn off Atmos playback! But the good ones - just like many of John Hanes mixes - sound great - and I do agree - I love to hear a band like Coldplay without so much bloody compression on that master And thank you John for all your feedback on Atmos over the past few weeks here.

A quick question - obviously in a stereo record - as engineers/mixers -we mix and get approval - and then that goes onto mastering - out of our hands. BUT - as you say what happenned with Coldplay for example - do you consider getting the stems from the stereo record - and then mixing those into an Atmos mix - a mix AND master for Atmos? How would a traditional "mastering" engineer fit in here?

If you are happy with an Atmos mix (which as explained gives us much more dynamics) and sits at -18LUFS - why/would you then hand it over for "mastering"? TIA
Old 2 days ago | Show parent
  #250
Lives for gear
 
TheHanes's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by HowardAudio ➡️
Thanks John - This is a very good review - agreed - and confirms that the good Atmos mixes to me do sound better than a stereo - BUT - there are so many bad Atmos mixes out there - many people might turn off Atmos playback! But the good ones - just like many of John Hanes mixes - sound great - and I do agree - I love to hear a band like Coldplay without so much bloody compression on that master And thank you John for all your feedback on Atmos over the past few weeks here.

A quick question - obviously in a stereo record - as engineers/mixers -we mix and get approval - and then that goes onto mastering - out of our hands. BUT - as you say what happenned with Coldplay for example - do you consider getting the stems from the stereo record - and then mixing those into an Atmos mix - a mix AND master for Atmos? How would a traditional "mastering" engineer fit in here?

If you are happy with an Atmos mix (which as explained gives us much more dynamics) and sits at -18LUFS - why/would you then hand it over for "mastering"? TIA
I am doing the Atmos mixes from the original stereo mix sessions from the Mixer (Serban) or from mixed stems from other mixers. I am definitely not mixing in Atmos from scratch / multitracks.

Mastering does have added value in many circumstances with Atmos. First, fixing ?bad? mixes, or fixing problems in mixes. Also, assembling albums, level matching between mixes (not every song needs to be as loud as -18dBLUFS), crossfading and timing between songs. An Atmos album can be delivered on Blu-Ray and would then need start / end points, etc.

Also another set of ears to double check the overworked Atmos mixer!

For much of the streaming that we are using to distribute these mixes now, it is basically a series of singles, so some of those things don't necessarily apply to the current circumstances.
Old 1 day ago | Show parent
  #251
Here for the gear
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHanes ➡️
I am doing the Atmos mixes from the original stereo mix sessions from the Mixer (Serban) or from mixed stems from other mixers. I am definitely not mixing in Atmos from scratch / multitracks.

Mastering does have added value in many circumstances with Atmos. First, fixing ?bad? mixes, or fixing problems in mixes. Also, assembling albums, level matching between mixes (not every song needs to be as loud as -18dBLUFS), crossfading and timing between songs. An Atmos album can be delivered on Blu-Ray and would then need start / end points, etc.

Also another set of ears to double check the overworked Atmos mixer!

For much of the streaming that we are using to distribute these mixes now, it is basically a series of singles, so some of those things don't necessarily apply to the current circumstances.
Thanks John - good points. Can you do all mastering and renders for all services in the Dolby Production Suite (using the same computer) - or do you need to have the Dolby Mastering Suite (using a dedicated computer for the DAMS).
Old 15 hours ago | Show parent
  #252
Lives for gear
 
🎧 15 years
Interview with Giles Martin on mixing Beatles in Atmos

An interview with Giles Martin about mixing Beatles in Dolby Atmos:

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...152417650.html
📝 Reply
Topic:
Post Reply

Welcome to the Gearspace Pro Audio Community!

Registration benefits include:
  • The ability to reply to and create new discussions
  • Access to members-only giveaways & competitions
  • Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As
  • Access to members-only sub forum discussions
  • Access to members-only Chat Room
  • Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio Classifieds for only USD $20/year
  • Promote your eBay auctions and Reverb.com listings for free
  • Remove this message!
You need an account to post a reply. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered.


 
 
Slide to join now Processing…

Forum Jump
Forum Jump