Quantcast
Digi002 Latency Measurments - Gearspace.com
The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
Digi002 Latency Measurments
Old 6th February 2007
  #1
Lives for gear
 
Harley-OIART's Avatar
 
๐ŸŽง 15 years
Digi002 Latency Measurments

I was doing the measurements myself, until I took a look on google, and low and behold some fine sir already beat me to the punch.

Here are the exact latency times for a ProTools LE rig running a Digi002(+Rack)

http://www.elvenminstrel.com/recordi...tencychart.htm
http://www.elvenminstrel.com/recordi...002latency.htm

Not that interesting I know, but I know some of you out there would like this information. Much credit to the original author, I should hope he doesn't mind me linking this here.

Old 6th February 2007
  #2
Gear Nut
 
Matej's Avatar
 
๐ŸŽง 15 years
This is awesome!! Thank you very much!!

Now I need to find this info for Digimax LT and Cranesong Spider.....
Old 6th February 2007 | Show parent
  #3
Lives for gear
 
Harley-OIART's Avatar
 
๐ŸŽง 15 years
Maybe : who knows.

Call me crazy, and me saying this will probably derail the thread into a pit of doom, but in a round about way : I actually am slightly against auto delay compensation. Reason being, I would rather just do it myself, and be sure it is perfect. I like to know how my "web" (mix) is built, and doing the compensation myself is easy. I am a wierdo though, and I love engineering. I am sure many of the ADC algorithm's out there are nothing short of perfect, and I am just obsessing. Still though, I kind of like the fact I know exactly where delay is being applied in-order to achieve time alignment.

Downside, and this is the big reason ADC should be a standard though, is like many have suggested - not having ADC is a creative hinder. You can work more creatively if you don't have to get all engineerski on the little details.

Anyways, thanks alot again to the original author of the website posted at the top of the thread. I was going to do all that work myself, and actually had half of it done already, but this guy did a great job indeed.

P.S. Check out the rest of his well done website.

P.P.S. Don't flame me about ADC or launch a discussion about ADC. Frankly if you want to debate it please be kind and start another thread, or tack on to an existing one.

Thanks again
Old 6th February 2007 | Show parent
  #4
Lives for gear
 
๐ŸŽง 15 years
I don't see where it says what version of Pro Tools he used to test this.

I know I read on the DUC that PT 7.3 supposedly has double the latency (at any setting) as it used to have. Not sure if that is 100% accurate but it perked my ears up a bit.

In other words if you set the playback buffer to 64 it will be the equivalent latency of when an older version of PT was set to 128.
๐Ÿ“ Reply

Similar Threads

Thread / Thread Starter Replies / Views Last Post
replies: 295 views: 72274
Avatar for anguswoodhead
anguswoodhead 26th March 2013
replies: 66 views: 4936
Avatar for shadowfac
shadowfac 21st April 2014
replies: 1296 views: 178324
Avatar for heraldo_jones
heraldo_jones 1st February 2016
replies: 85 views: 11170
Avatar for esencia
esencia 18th February 2018
Post Reply

Welcome to the Gearspace Pro Audio Community!

Registration benefits include:
  • The ability to reply to and create new discussions
  • Access to members-only giveaways & competitions
  • Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As
  • Access to members-only sub forum discussions
  • Access to members-only Chat Room
  • Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio Classifieds for only USD $20/year
  • Promote your eBay auctions and Reverb.com listings for free
  • Remove this message!
You need an account to post a reply. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered.


 
 
Slide to join now Processing…

Forum Jump
Forum Jump