The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
Pro Tools Mastering Taboo
Old 3rd February 2007 | Show parent
  #121
Lives for gear
 
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Tubb ➡️
...Configure PT with two stereo tracks, one for playback, the other to record. Route the "playback" track output (via AES) to an external DAC, to feed the analog EQ processing path. Connect the analog path, to an external ADC, and return (via AES) to the "record" track in PT. Route the "record" track output (via AES) to your monitor DAC.....
Jerry, just curious as to why you don't route the playback track through an Aux track and insert the hardware into that before routing to the record track?
Old 3rd February 2007 | Show parent
  #122
Lives for gear
 
jslevin's Avatar
 
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samc ➡️
Jerry, just curious as to why you don't route the playback track through an Aux track and insert the hardware into that before routing to the record track?
Why would he want to? Now your session has one more stereo track to keep track of, and nothing gained for it.

JSL
Old 4th February 2007 | Show parent
  #123
Lives for gear
 
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by jslevin ➡️
Now your session has one more stereo track to keep track of, and nothing gained for it.

JSL
I had no idea that it was so difficult to "keep track" of a stereo track.

Using the Aux channel/insert route gives you five insert points, which allows you to easily insert either analog or digital processing boxes. It also allows you to easily change the position of your inserted devises in the chain.

Jerry if you don't mind I would still like to know any special reason(s) you may have for your method.
Old 4th February 2007 | Show parent
  #124
Lives for gear
 
Jerry Tubb's Avatar
 
Verified Member
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samc ➡️
Jerry, just curious as to why you don't route the playback track through an Aux track and insert the hardware into that before routing to the record track?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samc ➡️
Using the Aux channel/insert route gives you five insert points, which allows you to easily insert either analog or digital processing boxes. It also allows you to easily change the position of your inserted devises in the chain.

Jerry if you don't mind I would still like to know any special reason(s) you may have for your method.
Hey Sam,

It's just the first way that occured to me. I use the Lavry Blue DAC/ADC unit to/from my analog EQ loop, not the stock PT convertors. I suppose the AUX method would work too.

Just curious if you've thought of a better reason to use the Aux track method that I might have overlooked?

Cheers - JT

Last edited by Jerry Tubb; 4th February 2007 at 05:07 AM.. Reason: clarification
Old 4th February 2007 | Show parent
  #125
Lives for gear
 
jslevin's Avatar
 
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samc ➡️
I had no idea that it was so difficult to "keep track" of a stereo track.
I didn't say it was difficult, I just said it seemed pointless. No need to be snippy, it was an honest question. Without the aux track, you get five insert points on the playback track. With it, you get ten, five each on the playback and aux tracks. I honestly just thought I was "missing" something. Is there something different about inserts on an Aux track as compared to inserts on a playback track?

JSL
Old 5th February 2007 | Show parent
  #126
Gear Maniac
 
mars's Avatar
 
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by masteringhouse ➡️
Just to take this thread in a slightly different direction, I would like to know how users of other systems perform ITB routing. This is an important feature for me.

As an example, how would you create an M/S matrix with a non-PT system not using any external gear or plug-ins?

I'm not trying to imply PT superiority here, just trying to understand how PT might be replaced without having to spend to much time in demoland.
How do you create your M/S Matrix in ProTools?
Old 5th February 2007 | Show parent
  #127
Lives for gear
 
masteringhouse's Avatar
 
Verified Member
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by mars ➡️
How do you create your M/S Matrix in ProTools?
See:

http://www.masteringhouse.com/master...s/midside.html

I realize that his can be done with other DAWs (and with an analog board for that matter). I was curious to see how this would be done with other DAWs if possible. Some do not use a metaphorical mixing board.

BTW this may be one of the reasons to use an aux channel(s) as suggested above.
Old 5th February 2007 | Show parent
  #128
Lives for gear
 
Jerry Tubb's Avatar
 
Verified Member
🎧 15 years
Hey Tom,

Nice description of the M/S routing process.

Yet another reason why PT can be used effectively in the mastering process.

Does your method sound better than using the Waves' S1 M/S plug-in?

JT
Old 5th February 2007 | Show parent
  #129
Lives for gear
 
masteringhouse's Avatar
 
Verified Member
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Tubb ➡️
Hey Tom,

Nice description of the M/S routing process.

Yet another reason why PT can be used effectively in the mastering process.

Does your method sound better than using the Waves' S1 M/S plug-in?

JT
Jerry,

I haven't tried using the Waves S1, though I've tried others. The ones I've tried tend to make a mix very thin and weak and don't allow you to get in there and make mods in regard to phase delay times and other tweaks. To be honest I never found the need beyond this setup.

Here's an interesting routing problem:

I had a friend of mine send me a mix of a vocalist who was a partner of his and died in an unfortunate car accident. Before she died she went to a studio and sang to a few Karaoke tracks that he would like to use in a tribute CD. Unfortunately the guy at the studio must have had a bad cable and one of the channels of the Karaoke tracks had it's polarity reversed while the vocal track (which has gone through a stereo reverb) is fine.

What type of routing configuration can be used to correct this?
Old 5th February 2007 | Show parent
  #130
Lives for gear
 
Roland's Avatar
 
2 Reviews written
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by masteringhouse ➡️
Jerry,

I haven't tried using the Waves S1, though I've tried others. The ones I've tried tend to make a mix very thin and weak and don't allow you to get in there and make mods in regard to phase delay times and other tweaks. To be honest I never found the need beyond this setup.

Here's an interesting routing problem:

I had a friend of mine send me a mix of a vocalist who was a partner of his and died in an unfortunate car accident. Before she died she went to a studio and sang to a few Karaoke tracks that he would like to use in a tribute CD. Unfortunately the guy at the studio must have had a bad cable and one of the channels of the Karaoke tracks had it's polarity reversed while the vocal track (which has gone through a stereo reverb) is fine.

What type of routing configuration can be used to correct this?


I would take a stab in the first instance of duplicating the track summing one pair together in Mono then flipping the phase on one channel (I would experiment with both to find out which worked better) on the copy. With the reverb their could be some slightly "phasing" artifacts, but it should work.

Regards


Roland
Old 5th February 2007 | Show parent
  #131
Lives for gear
 
🎧 15 years
Thanks JT and jslevin,

I use the aux route because it was the first method that I tried, and it worked.

I also use different processing chains and by patching the different chains through the insert, I can A/B them quickly, and/or change the position(s) of various processing elements in the chain easily......So in a sense like a patch bay.

I guess there are no sonic advantages to either method. By the way JT, you can also use external converters on all insert points...but I'm sure you guys knew that already.
Old 8th February 2007 | Show parent
  #132
Mastering Moderator
 
Riccardo's Avatar
 
Verified Member
2 Reviews written
🎧 15 years
Jay, Jerry, Thor and everybody else using Blade,
is there a function/preference similar to X-over solo mode in PT.
In other words if you solo a panel the other one goes into mute and vice versa.
In normal operation if you solo one panel and then solo the other one, the first one won't mute.
Am I missing something?
📝 Reply

Similar Threads

Thread / Thread Starter Replies / Views Last Post
replies: 55 views: 29868
Avatar for IM WHO YOU THINK
IM WHO YOU THINK 13th October 2020
replies: 15929 views: 1525767
Avatar for Ragan
Ragan 11th January 2019
replies: 1296 views: 177038
Avatar for heraldo_jones
heraldo_jones 1st February 2016
Post Reply

Welcome to the Gearspace Pro Audio Community!

Registration benefits include:
  • The ability to reply to and create new discussions
  • Access to members-only giveaways & competitions
  • Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As
  • Access to members-only sub forum discussions
  • Access to members-only Chat Room
  • Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio Classifieds for only USD $20/year
  • Promote your eBay auctions and Reverb.com listings for free
  • Remove this message!
You need an account to post a reply. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered.


 
 
Slide to join now Processing…

Forum Jump
Forum Jump