Quote:
Originally Posted by
dontsimon
➡️
It's interesting that the Warm has been very favouribly reviewed, sounding very close in certain circumstances to a U87. So could this mean a 3U at a tenth of the price would give the u87 a run for it's money??
So, here's my take on this. For context, I'm a session musician and composer/producer, not a full-time audio engineer, but I do remote sessions from my home studio year-round. I own both a u87 and a Warbler MKID.
The Neumann u87ai is my favorite mic ever, and it works brilliantly on everything I need it for (saxophones and woodwinds, mostly). It captures a level of detail and clarity that the Warbler doesn't, and it sounds effortlessly high-end on a good source in a good room.
The Warbler isn't QUITE as good as the Neumann in terms of detail and clarity, but it's phenomenally close in terms of overall quality and utility. (From what I understand, it's very close to a pre-AI u87, with maybe a more subdued top end and more midrange saturation, but I'll defer to people who have A-B'd those specific pieces for real perspective.) It has a more "vintage" and almost tubey flavor that's really, really nice, and in certain circumstances preferable to the Neumann.
For example, I'll bring it to live gigs that are live-streamed,
like this one.
On my most recent record, I did about half of the saxophone and woodwind parts on the Warbler and about half on the u87. I actually cannot remember which parts were done with which mic, and in the mix, I can't tell which is which. Under the microscope, the differences are more clear, but when it comes to just making good music recordings, the Warbler is more than capable, and for the money it's a no-brainer.