Quote:
Originally Posted by
Silver Sonya
➡️
I have a single Daking FET II, maybe I should get another one and try it in stereo Compex mode? I must say I'm intrigued now.
My friend J. Robbins also likes the Dakings on the stereo buss, having worked with John Agnello. So you will be pleased to know that the disease is spreading!
Are you intrigued by
this reissue or are you happy with your Dakings? How would you characterize the difference?
- c
John goes on collecting more compexes!
I don't buy much gear.... but in truth, my original model Compex is one of the few things I own, and bring with me (it's from Record Plant NY originally).
I don't feel I NEED more of them, but if I did, I would certainly check out this new version at least.
How it compares, i don't know... but I WILL say I am leery of "improvements" when people are asking for originals.
1073s come to mind, or AC30s, or U47s... not a single "improved" version comes close to sounding as good as the originals to me.
nothing SONIC needs to be "improved" about the original F-760x-rs.
the switches and pots could certainly be sturdier... but there is nothing wrong with or "seventies" about its sound.
Do people dismiss an 1776 as "seventies"? or a Fairchild as too "sixties"? (fifties?)
bollocks... that's marketing nonsense.
the reason to WANT a Compex is to sound like a Compex, not someone's take on one.
The Daking does the same attack and release times that I like and use on the Compex (that's release: E, for those keeping score), but with its Trident A line amp sound.
TO ME it sounds a bit harder and maybe even clearer, but there is still something about the AD&R character I keep coming back to; especially on the stereo mix.
As John once said: 'when it goes on the stereo bus it starts to sound like a record to me'.
OTOH, on individual instruments, drum room mics, pianos, even vocals, I often prefer the Daking to the Compex.