Quantcast
m149 vs rode k2 !!!! ( nice test ) - Page 5 - Gearspace.com
The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
m149 vs rode k2 !!!! ( nice test )
Old 5th February 2011 | Show parent
  #121
Lives for gear
 
Ephi82's Avatar
 
🎧 10 years
Did the 149 sound better than the K2? Not much question there! I would love to own one.

However, what is more important, the sculptor or the chisel? The song or the singer?

I have a K2, and agree that it doesn't have the finesse in the high end, and the depth and roundness of the mids and lows.

I bought 2 NOS tubes (Telefunken and Mullard) that bring nice, slightly different improvements and flavors, use a little subtractive EQ, and with judicious compression, I am VERY happy. Does it sound like the 149? No! Does it remind me of a U47, heck no! Can I get some vocal tracks down for my voice that sounds best they ever have? yes!

At this point, I rather spend the $3,000 i saved on more mics in my locker for different sources.
Old 12th November 2011 | Show parent
  #122
Gear Addict
 
🎧 10 years
Teh Neuman sounds more expensive but could imagine that in a busy mix the rode could be easier to integrate
Old 13th November 2011 | Show parent
  #123
Gear Nut
 
Silvan's Avatar
 
🎧 15 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by leonardo777 ➑️
Teh Neuman sounds more expensive...
Yes, it does - well spotted!

Quote:
Originally Posted by leonardo777 ➑️
...but could imagine that in a busy mix the rode could be easier to integrate
Well, you can imagine whatever you like, but speaking from direct experience, the reverse is true.
Old 13th November 2011 | Show parent
  #124
Lives for gear
 
NEWTON IN ORBIT's Avatar
I thought the differences would be more slight, from some of the comments here. I don't get it.

The Neumann, is absolutely more open, relaxed, bigger, and smoother sounding. The K2 sounds compressed and straining to keep up with the neumann's relaxed way of dealing with the source.

The dynamic range sounds (feels) wider on the Neumann for sure.

The Neumann you could make sound like the K2 (not sure who'd want to), but you could never make the k2 sound like the Neumann. It already sounds constricted in the upper mids... how are you going to undo that?

It's not a more expensive snobbery thing for me either. I really am always hoping a budget mic will come out that sounds as good as the expensive models. This is slightly saddening, because it shows to get this sound, you will still always have to spend the money.

One last thing, and I am really truly surprised. A lot of people on here swear the difference is slight, and the RODE stuff holds up to mics costing "5 times as much". You hear this a LOT. Can these people hear?

This combined with all the recent RODE adverstising, such as the factory tour etc., had me thinking they had really stepped up the quality.

The video was claiming the fact that RODE's super hi tech computerized manufacturing made for better sounding, more consistent mics.
Not the case here at all.

They were talking down the small boutique outfits, claiming they were made at a "kitchen table". I think I'd take a handmade kitchen table mic over the robot RODE for sure, after hearing this.

I didn't like the RODE at all. Sorry. Almost sounds like a cheaper electret. Maybe a an ancient Audio Technica from the 1980's or something.

My apologies.

john
Old 13th November 2011 | Show parent
  #125
Gear Addict
 
Leonardo_007's Avatar
 
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by leonardo777 ➑️
Teh Neuman sounds more expensive but could imagine that in a busy mix the rode could be easier to integrate
nice name, mate.

why do you think, the rode would be "easier to integrate" within a mix?

on what kind of instruments, particularly?

when it's about background vocals or stuff like that, i'd agree to some extent. But as soon as you'd like to shed some light on any meaningful element, i'd prefer a mic like Neumann, Telefunken or that like.

my 0.02 USD
Old 14th November 2011
  #126
Lives for gear
 
stardustmedia's Avatar
1. I even hear a difference on my crappy computer speakers
2. How come the same source was recorded with such a big space between the mics?

The Rode sounds nice for its money. But the M149 seems still more creamy.
Old 16th November 2011 | Show parent
  #127
Lives for gear
 
hereticskeptic's Avatar
 
1 Review written
🎧 10 years
I'll always wonder what one's response would be, had they not been told what mics were being compared.
Old 16th November 2011 | Show parent
  #128
Lives for gear
 
RKrizman's Avatar
 
🎧 15 years
It would have been the same. I can't believe it's even controversial.

Either some new aesthetic has emerged that I'm not aware of or a lot of you guys need to treat your rooms.

-R
Old 17th November 2011
  #129
Lives for gear
 
hereticskeptic's Avatar
 
1 Review written
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by RKrizman ➑️
It would have been the same. I can't believe it's even controversial.

Either some new aesthetic has emerged that I'm not aware of or a lot of you guys need to treat your rooms.

-R
Oh no, I'm not suggesting that there is no obvious difference, or not. Just thinking that many people may not see the m149 as better when listening, had they not known which clip was the m149.

In other words, for some, it's "cool" to be of the lot who heard the more expensive mic as far superior, while for others, they actually have developed the ability to hear the differences in sonics that allow them to discern better quality, from poorer quality.

It's simply something that always makes me wonder who prefers a certain sound, because they know and hear better quality, and who prefers a certain mic, because they don't want to be the individual who doesn't know quality from crap. My post had nothing to do with the idea that the K2 is on par with the m149, whatsoever.

Hope the makes sense.
Old 17th November 2011 | Show parent
  #130
Lives for gear
 
RKrizman's Avatar
 
🎧 15 years
I guess my point is that the Neumann was so clearly and obviously superior to the K2 that expectation bias wouldn't be a factor. I mean, really, there's no comparison. Anyone could hear the difference blind, and I'm really surprised that anyone would prefer the K2.

I've gone on record in the past as disliking that particular Neumann, but in this example IMO the objective differences in quality is obvious. One mic makes a beautiful picture of the source, the other one is flapping in the wind.

-R
Old 17th November 2011 | Show parent
  #131
Lives for gear
 
hereticskeptic's Avatar
 
1 Review written
🎧 10 years
I hear ya.

Not close whatsoever, in my opinion, through laptop speakers. Naturally, my treated room would reveal this even more.
Old 12th December 2011 | Show parent
  #132
Here for the gear
 
🎧 10 years
I have got both M149 and K2 (and others including ksm32, akg414 xlII, peralman tm1 etc and a host of pres) and a very well treated room. As far as vocals in concerned (and only vocals / VO) I reach for K2 99% of the time. I do not even remember using M149 in the past two years on my vocals. If you want a pristine sound go for a solid state like akg 414 with a non tube pre like grace m101 or isa one.

My K2 is never stwiched off. It is always on and man it sounds good and buttery through my solo 610 which is also on 90% of the time. I am a sound contractor and install PA systems but started several years ago recording vocals which is my passion. There are very few mics that I have not tested (like a c12 or U47) as they are hard to get. My two cents is that K2 matches my voice and others in my house and it sounds dam good with the stock tube. Changed a host of tubes in it but finally went back to the stock one. I have access to audio equipment from my supplier (as I do big purchases from him for my installations) so I keep testing different mics and pres for fun so have some knowledge in terms of mics and pres.

I like K2 (white), you might like M149 (black), who cares as long as it sounds(looks) good on you. Experimentation is the only option.
Old 12th December 2011 | Show parent
  #133
Lives for gear
 
DarkSky Media's Avatar
 
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by RKrizman ➑️
I guess my point is that the Neumann was so clearly and obviously superior to the K2 that expectation bias wouldn't be a factor. I mean, really, there's no comparison. Anyone could hear the difference blind, and I'm really surprised that anyone would prefer the K2.

I've gone on record in the past as disliking that particular Neumann, but in this example IMO the objective differences in quality is obvious. One mic makes a beautiful picture of the source, the other one is flapping in the wind.

-R
Spot On.
Old 23rd January 2012
  #134
Here for the gear
 
🎧 10 years
And the winner is M149 !
Old 23rd January 2012 | Show parent
  #135
Gear Head
 
dvonche's Avatar
 
🎧 10 years
The Rode sounds good, but I prefer The bass response on the Neummann. Now IF one day I have the money to buy the Neumann, I'll prefer buy a lot gear and a K2
Old 24th January 2012 | Show parent
  #136
Lives for gear
 
stardustmedia's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cristhian ➑️
And the winner is M149 !
Darth Vader: "Nooooooooooooooooooooooo "
heh heh heh

Totally agree with you... M149 wins everytime over the Rode.
Old 26th September 2020 | Show parent
  #137
Here for the gear
 
userroscoe's Avatar
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ciozzi ➑️
Two people said the difference was there but minimal. What monitors are you using guys ? how's your room ? The M149 has a much more authoritative sound and the low end sounds huge in comparison. It's funny I've heard people claiming a night and day difference for much less, but this is gearslutz, everything's possible
. Man I swear lol. People A bandit their ears leave their ears and their mind when they see cheaper all the time. M149 sounds way better on my Studio monitors
Old 28th September 2020 | Show parent
  #138
Lives for gear
 
chrisdee's Avatar
 
9 Reviews written
🎧 10 years
I was going to listen but seems like the files no longer are available.
Anyway, I sold my M149 earlier this year after not finding any use for it for years.

At whatever mic distance or polar pattern it always sounded harsh/piercing in the 1k to 5k area when pushed with dynamic and louder vocals but also on acoustic guitar. It's detailed and probably works ok for softer sources but that's not the versatillity I need in a mic.
Old 29th September 2020
  #139
Lives for gear
 
elamberth's Avatar
 
1 Review written
🎧 10 years
Funny how our experience/ ears differ. Love the m149,but need to adjust the polar patterns; really sounds like different mics with different patterns. Very nice through a 1073.
Old 29th September 2020 | Show parent
  #140
Lives for gear
 
1 Review written
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by userroscoe ➑️
People A bandit their ears leave their ears and their mind when they see cheaper all the time.
Maybe there is a possible future where even young children will understand this sentence.
Old 29th September 2020 | Show parent
  #141
Lives for gear
 
chrisdee's Avatar
 
9 Reviews written
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by elamberth ➑️
Funny how our experience/ ears differ. Love the m149,but need to adjust the polar patterns; really sounds like different mics with different patterns. Very nice through a 1073.
So what sources do you use it on?
Old 30th September 2020 | Show parent
  #142
Lives for gear
 
tkaitkai's Avatar
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by elamberth ➑️
Funny how our experience/ ears differ. Love the m149,but need to adjust the polar patterns; really sounds like different mics with different patterns. Very nice through a 1073.
Yep, huge fan of the M149 over here. Never sounds harsh when I use it, and I have a very mid-forward voice, particularly hot around 1 - 2kHz.

I rarely need to fuss around with patterns, either. Sometimes 1 click over towards fig8 sounds cool, and omni can work pretty well on acoustics. But 9 times out of 10, it's just cardioid with a roll off at 80Hz.

I guess it all just depends on how you hear things.
Old 30th September 2020 | Show parent
  #143
Lives for gear
 
Glenn Bucci's Avatar
 
43 Reviews written
🎧 10 years
The Rode K2 is one of the best tube mics under $1,000. We'll made, consistency between mics, and decent design. But it can't compare with the Neumann. I would have compared it with Telefunken TF51 instead which has more of the high end magic that the Rode lacks.
Old 30th September 2020 | Show parent
  #144
Lives for gear
 
chrisdee's Avatar
 
9 Reviews written
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkaitkai ➑️
I guess it all just depends on how you hear things.
Thats probably it. We all hear a bit different.
πŸ“ Reply

Similar Threads

Thread / Thread Starter Replies / Views Last Post
replies: 87 views: 45253
Avatar for ray_subsonic
ray_subsonic 24th November 2011
replies: 73 views: 25928
Avatar for monkeyxx
monkeyxx 24th May 2013
replies: 5910 views: 781675
Avatar for Neptune45
Neptune45 4th July 2021
replies: 148 views: 17395
Avatar for andersmv
andersmv 1st April 2018
Post Reply

Welcome to the Gearspace Pro Audio Community!

Registration benefits include:
  • The ability to reply to and create new discussions
  • Access to members-only giveaways & competitions
  • Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As
  • Access to members-only sub forum discussions
  • Access to members-only Chat Room
  • Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio Classifieds for only USD $20/year
  • Promote your eBay auctions and Reverb.com listings for free
  • Remove this message!
You need an account to post a reply. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered.


 
 
Slide to join now Processing…

Forum Jump
Forum Jump