Rosetta 200 Vs Aurora 16 Shout Out The "test" - Page 5 - Gearspace.com
The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
Rosetta 200 Vs Aurora 16 Shout Out The "test"
Old 28th May 2008 | Show parent
Lives for gear
🎧 15 years
Do a search then! They've stated it again and again.
Old 28th May 2008 | Show parent
Lives for gear
amd's Avatar
🎧 10 years
Originally Posted by u b k ➡️
i've only been here 2 years but in all that time i've never seen apogee claim anything of the sort. i've never even seen an apogee owner claim anything of the sort.

come to think of it, i've never seen a post from apogee at all.

C'mon are you kidding with us? With all due respect, that's like saying " I have never heard of a Pacifica, Peluso, Focal monitors or a 500 series preamp in the GS forums."
Old 28th May 2008 | Show parent
Lives for gear
🎧 15 years
Far better would it be to use a natural source, like they recently did at the Fox stages to evaluate the best converter for their orchestral recordings. Blind listening tests were done comparing the converted version to the source (a life string quartet). I guess I don’t have to tell you who won that contest…

The bottom line is indeed comparing to the source ( I do that all the time with every new design). What does it do with your image, your spatial information, your depth? If there is a huge tonal difference like you describe, there is usually something wrong with the setup.

Best regards,[/QUOTE]

I'm glad i'm not alone in saying you CANNOT eval a converter with anything but a analog source. To do otherwise is merely a waste of time

Last edited by MIKEHARRIS; 28th May 2008 at 08:09 PM.. Reason: sp
Old 31st May 2008 | Show parent
Lives for gear
mdjice's Avatar
🎧 10 years
a waste of time?? so i guess you never record keyboards or sound modules into your computer then??
If you would then you would understand that IT IS VERY IMPORTANT and it is something that producers do EVERYDAY...unlike recording a symphonie.
I could care less for the results from recording white noise as I could care less from the result from recording a 40 people symphonie or choir, why? Because with my genre of music I will NEVER need to do that. I need tests showing results on daily producer routine with instruments that are common in a studio...what's more common then a sound module?
Old 30th June 2008 | Show parent
Lives for gear
desotoslo's Avatar
🎧 10 years
Originally Posted by youngmain ➡️
Hay Lucas when are you guys coming with an 8 or 4 channel of the X series convertors with spidf. Knock them out already man!!!!

I'd love to see 2 channel X by Apogee

Better yet, I'd LOVE to see 2 channel Aurora! Man, I'd buy it in like -1 seconds.
📝 Reply

Similar Threads

Thread / Thread Starter Replies / Views Last Post
replies: 109 views: 21109
Avatar for Pilepoile
Pilepoile 24th June 2008
replies: 55 views: 35107
IM WHO YOU THINK 13th October 2020
replies: 2433 views: 428667
Avatar for funka
funka 2 weeks ago
replies: 1296 views: 188543
Avatar for heraldo_jones
heraldo_jones 1st February 2016
Post Reply

Welcome to the Gearspace Pro Audio Community!

Registration benefits include:
  • The ability to reply to and create new discussions
  • Access to members-only giveaways & competitions
  • Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As
  • Access to members-only sub forum discussions
  • Access to members-only Chat Room
  • Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio Classifieds for only USD $20/year
  • Promote your eBay auctions and Reverb.com listings for free
  • Remove this message!
You need an account to post a reply. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered.

Slide to join now Processing…

Forum Jump
Forum Jump