Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pelevin
➡️
Hi ZC. Because I have the SE1X I tried a while back to ask for thoughts from anyone on how the SE1X in Oberheim filter mode compared soundwise with the Boomstar SEM, but very sadly got no replies. It's more out of curiosity than genuine finger on the trigger of buying one but how'd you think the ATC-X Oberheim & Boomstar stack up soundwise. Very much of an ilk or distant cousins?
Also slightly curious if not puzzled as to why one would go for teh Boomstar SEM rather than the actual Oberheim SEM re-issue. Price doesn't seem so different as to be determining.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rids
➡️
I would go for the Obie SEM if I wanted that creamy goodness. The Boom is a different animal that can hit similar territory.
And that's the thing, the different circuits in the Boomstar bring out a different tone/sound from the filters. The snappy envelopes play a big part in this.
The Boomstar is totally different to the ATC-X(i) imo. They sound different to me in tone, but you can still tell they are from the same family. And of course the Boomstar has much more punch than the ATC-Xi. I've found the ATC to be able to bass and arps, but the Boomstar bass and arps are very different on account of the snappier envelopes. And the overdrive and feedback interact differently with the envelopes and I feel bring out more harmonics. Whereas the ATC is greasy, but smooth, warm and sweet.
Sorry, I didn't see this quote earlier, but it seems like rids nailed it. I just did a side by side and while they occupy similar territory, they're pretty different. First thing I notice is that the frequency range of the Boomstar's filter isn't as wide. It seems to top out at 11.5 khz, while the ATC keeps going all the way though the range. The envelopes are different, but not as crazy different as people seem to make them out to be. One of the most noticeable differences seems to be that with the filter envelope amount (filter 1) set all the way up on the ATC-X, I get oscillator bleed though even if the sustain is set to zero. The EG doesn't seem to really moving the filter though the entire range. The Boomstar behaves more like you'd expect.
If I were to wax poetic, as I'm known to do,

I'd say that the ATC-X is funky. Funk factor 10. If you were to ask me what I'd use for a hiphop, Dub or R&B tone, I'd say ATC, all the way. The Boomstar is tighter. I'd say it was perfect for harder music styles. Of course, these are generalities. I can get pretty harsh with the ATC, and the Boomstar can get pretty funky.